Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34430749›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2021

The efficacy of TAP block versus ilioinguinal block for post-cesarean section pain management: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tikuneh Yetneberk, Basazinew Chekol, Diriba Teshome

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07560267 (Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Postoperative Pain Management in Nephrectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07560267 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Postoperative Pain Management in Nephrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBangladesh Medical UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled66ConditionsErector Spinae Plane Block, Nephrectomy, Postoperative PainArmsUltrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tikuneh YetneberkDepartment of Anesthesia, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.
Basazinew ChekolDepartment of Anesthesia, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.
Diriba TeshomeDepartment of Anesthesia, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.
Debre Tabor University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundControversy still exists regarding the analgesic efficacy of transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block versus ilioinguinal or iliohypogastric (IL/IH) nerve block for postoperative pain management following cesarean section. This meta-analysis aimed to perform relatively credible pooled results on the efficacy of the TAP versus IL/IH nerve block for postoperative pain management after cesarean section.

methodsDatabases such as: PubMed/MEDLINE, Google scholar, and google were systematically searched. studies compared the analgesic efficacy of TAP versus IL/IH nerve block for postoperative pain management following cesarean section were included. Data were extracted by three reviewers independently by using Microsoft Excel and then exported to STATA™ 16 version statistical software for analysis. We used a random-effects model meta-analysis and the mean difference of analgesic efficacy with a 95 ​% confidence interval was reported based on Preferred Reporting Items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA).

resultsFive studies with a total of 390 (196 in TAP and 194 in IL/IH) study participants were included in this meta-analysis. No statistically significant difference was observed between the TAP and IL/IH groups in time to first rescue analgesic request, total postoperative analgesic consumption in milligrams of intravenous tramadol equivalence, and post pain severity score at different points of time both rest and movement.

conclusionThis meta-analysis revealed that both approaches have similar postoperative analgesic efficacy following cesarean section. we recommend that the clinician may consider either approach for post-cesarean section pain management.

Indexed as

Cesarean sectionIL/IH blockMeta-analysisTAP block

Identifiers

PMID34430749
PMCPMC8367791
OpenAlexW3195476855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.