Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34430700›Full record

ArticleSSM - population health2021

Are children in female-headed households at a disadvantage? An analysis of immunization coverage and stunting prevalence: in 95 low- and middle-income countries.

Andrea Wendt, Franciele Hellwig, Ghada E Saad, Cheikh Faye, Zitha Mokomane, Ties Boerma, Aluisio J D Barros, Cesar Victora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - population health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Beyond air pollution: a national assessment of cooking-related burns in Ghana.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrea WendtInternational Center for Equity in Health, Postgraduate Program of Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Franciele HellwigInternational Center for Equity in Health, Postgraduate Program of Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Ghada E SaadFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Cheikh FayeAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Zitha MokomaneUniversity of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Ties BoermaUniversity of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Aluisio J D BarrosInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Cesar VictoraInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of inequalities in child health have given limited attention to household structure and headship. The few existing reports on child outcomes in male and female-headed households have produced inconsistent results. The aim of our analyses was to provide a global view of the influence of sex of the household head on child health in cross-sectional surveys from up to 95 LMICs. Studied outcomes were full immunization coverage in children aged 12-23 months and stunting prevalence in under-five children. We analyzed the most recent nationally-representative surveys for each country (since 2010) with available data. After initial exploratory analyses, we focused on three types of households: a) male-headed household (MHH) comprised 73.1% of all households in the pooled analyses; b) female Headed Household (FHH) with at least one adult male represented 9.8% of households; and c) FHH without an adult male accounted for 15.0% of households. Our analyses also included the following covariates: wealth index, education of the child's mother and urban/rural residence. Meta-analytic approaches were used to calculate pooled effects across the countries with MHH as the reference category. Regarding full immunization, the pooled prevalence ratio for FHH (any male) was 0.99 (0.97; 1.01) and that for FHH (no male) was 0.99 (0.97; 1.02). For stunting prevalence, the pooled prevalence ratio for FHH (any male) was 1.00 (0.98; 1.02) and for FHH (no male) was 1.00 (0.98; 1.02). Adjustment for covariates did not lead to any noteworthy change in the results. No particular patterns were found among different world regions. A few countries presented significant inequalities with different directions of association, indicating the diversity of FHH and how complex the meaning and measurement of household headship may be. Further research is warranted to understand context, examine mediating factors, and exploring alternative definitions of household headship in countries with some association.

Indexed as

Female-headed householdsImmunizationStuntingWoman-headed households

Identifiers

PMID34430700
PMCPMC8369002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.