ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2021
Application of artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal disease: a narrative review.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Diagnostic Laparoscopy in Staging and Treatment Planning of Gastric Cancer: A 400-Patient Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence to revolutionize IBD clinical trials: a comprehensive review.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Review
- Public Imaging Datasets of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy for Artificial Intelligence: a Review.Journal of digital imaging · 2023Review
- Application of Machine Learning Based on Structured Medical Data in Gastroenterology.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- GIT-Net: An Ensemble Deep Learning-Based GI Tract Classification of Endoscopic Images.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe collected evidence on the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in gastroenterology field. The review was carried out from two aspects of endoscopic types and gastrointestinal diseases, and briefly summarized the challenges and future directions in this field.
backgroundDue to the advancement of computational power and a surge of available data, a solid foundation has been laid for the growth of AI. Specifically, varied machine learning (ML) techniques have been emerging in endoscopic image analysis. To improve the accuracy and efficiency of clinicians, AI has been widely applied to gastrointestinal endoscopy.
methodsPubMed electronic database was searched using the keywords containing "AI", "ML", "deep learning (DL)", "convolution neural network", "endoscopy (such as white light endoscopy (WLE), narrow band imaging (NBI) endoscopy, magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (ME-NBI), chromoendoscopy, endocytoscopy (EC), and capsule endoscopy (CE))". Search results were assessed for relevance and then used for detailed discussion.
conclusionsThis review described the basic knowledge of AI, ML, and DL, and summarizes the application of AI in various endoscopes and gastrointestinal diseases. Finally, the challenges and directions of AI in clinical application were discussed. At present, the application of AI has solved some clinical problems, but more still needs to be done.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.