ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021
The integration of bevacizumab improves tumor response and survival in patients with refractory cervical cancer treated with radical chemoradiotherapy.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Addition of Bevacizumab to Chemotherapy and Its Impact on Clinical Efficacy in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in neoadjuvant and concurrent chemoradiotherapy for refractory cervical cancer patients.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2024Article
- Synergistic therapeutic effect of low-dose bevacizumab with cisplatin-based chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent cervical cancer.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2021Article
- Real-world Efficacy Data on Anti-Angiogenic Drugs in Recurrent Small Cell Cervical Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundManagement of refractory cervical cancers (CC) is a debated question and rises dilemma in clinical practice. This study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of bevacizumab combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of refractory CC.
methodsA total of 129 patients with refractory CC who received radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) were included in this study. Among the patients, 64 received combination treatment with bevacizumab, while the 65 remaining patients did not receive bevacizumab. Treatment response was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumorsversion1.1. The Cox proportional-hazards model was applied to determine prognostic factors associated with overall survival and the tumor response during treatment was analyzed for patients treated with bevacizumab.
resultsBevacizumab was an independent prognostic factor (P=0.017). Therefore, we only analyzed 64 patients who received combination treatment with bevacizumab. In the 64 patients treated with bevacizumab, the 3-year OS, locoregional relapse-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 87.2%, 98.1%, and 81%, respectively. Complete clinical response rates were 37.8% (17/45) for patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), complete clinical response rates were 62.5% (40/64), 73.3% (33/45) and 52.6% (10/19) before brachytherapy (BT), respectively for the entire cohort, patients with NACT and chemoradiotherapy and patients with chemoradiotherapy only. The 2-year OS rate was higher for patients who achieved a complete clinical response BT than for patients who did not, 94.6%
conclusionsBevacizumab combined with radical chemoradiotherapy is a safe and tolerable treatment option for refractory CC, with quicker tumor regression and high OS, locoregional relapse-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.