Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34430577›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021

Reliability and agreement of the central and mid-peripheral corneal thickness measured by a new Scheimpflug based imaging.

A-Yong Yu, Junming Ye, Giacomo Savini, Yiran Wang, Tianjiao Zhang, Min Chen, Qinmei Wang, Jinhai Huang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A-Yong YuEye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Junming YeEye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Giacomo SaviniG.B. Bietti Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Yiran WangEye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Tianjiao ZhangEye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Min ChenEye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Qinmei WangEye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Jinhai HuangEye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Wenzhou Medical University · CNAffiliated Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College · CNIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo assess the intra-observer repeatability and inter-observer reproducibility of central corneal thickness (CCT) and mid-peripheral corneal thickness (MPCT) measurements using a new Scheimpflug imaging instrument (Scansys) and compare the agreement with the rotating Scheimpflug corneal tomographer (Pentacam HR).

methodsThe same well-trained operator performed the measuring using the two devices, after which Scansys measurements were repeated by another operator. Both instruments required three consecutive measurements per subject. Corneal thickness measurements were obtained by each instrument, including CCT, thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), pupil corneal thickness (PCT), and MPCT. Test-retest repeatability (TRT), within-subject coefficient of variation (CoV), and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to evaluate repeatability and reproducibility. A paired t-test was used to compare the differences between Scansys and Pentacam, and the agreement was compared with Bland-Altman plots.

resultsThis study enrolled 112 healthy subjects. The CoV were <0.91% and 0.55% for repeatability and reproducibility, respectively. The ICC was close to 1 in all measurements. For intra-observer repeatability in the CT

conclusionsThe new Scheimpflug imaging instrument showed excellent intra-observer repeatability and inter-observer reproducibility for corneal thickness measurements. The agreement analysis suggested that Scansys and Pentacam could be interchangeably used between the central region and CT

Indexed as

agreementbiometrycorneal thicknessreliabilityScheimpflug

Identifiers

PMID34430577
PMCPMC8350684
OpenAlexW3178362397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.