Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34430525›Full record

ArticleHepatobiliary surgery and nutrition2021

A combined Cox and logistic model provides accurate predictive performance in estimation of time-dependent probabilities for recurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection.

Seogsong Jeong, Guijuan Luo, Qiang Gao, Jing Chen, Xiaolong Liu, Liangqing Dong, Yongjie Zhang, Feng Shen, Qingbao Cheng, Chengjun Sui and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Postpartum related intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma withJournal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Seogsong JeongDepartment of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Guijuan LuoInternational Cooperation Laboratory on Signal Transduction, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Institute, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Qiang GaoDepartment of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, and Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Ministry of Education), Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jing ChenInternational Cooperation Laboratory on Signal Transduction, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Institute, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaolong LiuMengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Liangqing DongDepartment of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, and Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Ministry of Education), Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yongjie ZhangBiliary Tract Department II, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Feng ShenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Qingbao ChengBiliary Tract Department I, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Chengjun SuiDepartment of Special Medical Care & Liver Transplantation, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Jingfeng LiuMengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Hongyang WangInternational Cooperation Laboratory on Signal Transduction, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Institute, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Qiang XiaDepartment of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Lei ChenInternational Cooperation Laboratory on Signal Transduction, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Institute, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma has heterogeneous outcomes after resection. There remains a need for broadly applicable recurrence-specific tool offering precise evaluation on curativeness of resection.

methodsA four hospital-based clinical cohort involving 1,655 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who received surgical resection were studied. Cox and logistic models were networked into one system containing risk categories with distinctive probabilities of recurrence. Prediction of time-to-recurrence was performed by formulizing time-dependent risk probabilities. The model was validated in three clinical cohorts (n=332).

resultsFrom the training cohort, 10 and 11 covariates, including diabetes, cholelithiasis, albumin, platelet count, alpha fetoprotein, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, carcinoembryonic antigen, hepatitis B virus infection, tumor size and number, resection type, and lymph node metastasis, from Cox and logistic models were identified significant for recurrence-free survival (RFS). The combined Cox & logistic ranking system (CCLRS)-adjusted time-dependent probabilities were categorized into seven ranks (5-yr RFS for lowest and highest ranks were 75%

conclusionsThe CCLRS allows precise estimation on risk of recurrence for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection. It could be applicative when estimating time-dependent disease status and stratifying individuals who sole resection of the tumor would not be curative.

Indexed as

biliary malignancyhepatectomynomogramPrimary liver cancerregression modelresectionsurgery

Identifiers

PMID34430525
PMCPMC8351002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.