Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34430418›Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2021

Subtotal surgical therapy for localized prostate cancer: a single-center precision prostatectomy experience in 25 patients, and SEER-registry data analysis.

Akshay Sood, Wooju Jeong, Jacob Keeley, Firas Abdollah, Oudai Hassan, Nilesh Gupta, Mani Menon

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07348367 (A Randomized Comparison of Radical Prostatectomy and Precision Prostatectomy in Low- and Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancers.), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07348367 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Comparison of Radical Prostatectomy and Precision Prostatectomy in Low- and Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancers.

TypeinterventionalSponsorHenry Ford Health SystemRan2026 to 2028Enrolled160ConditionsProstatectomyArmsRadical Prostatectomy, Precision Prostatectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The use of focal therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer in Canada Where are we, how did we get here, and where are we going?Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akshay SoodVattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Wooju JeongVattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Jacob KeeleyVCORE - Vattikuti Urology Institute Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Firas AbdollahVattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Oudai HassanDepartment of Pathology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Nilesh GuptaDepartment of Pathology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Mani MenonVattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Henry Ford Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe recently described a novel form of focal therapy for prostate cancer (CaP)-the precision prostatectomy. Here we report on the first 25 consecutive patients. Further, utilizing Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-registry data, we assess long-term oncological efficacies of various focal therapy techniques.

methodsMen who met the criteria: (I) PSA ≤15 ng/mL, (II) stage ≤cT2, (III) dominant unilateral lesion with Gleason ≤4+3 with any number or percentage (%) of cores involved ipsilaterally on biopsy, (IV) no primary Gleason ≥4 contralaterally, and (V) preoperative erectile function score (IIEF-5/SHIM) of ≥17 with/without PDE-5i were included in this prospective, single-arm, IDEAL stage 2b study (December 2016 to July 2017). Safety of the technique, and intermediate-term urinary, sexual and oncological outcomes were studied. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis were used to assess 12-month urinary continence (0-1 pad), 12-month sexual potency (SHIM ≥17), and 36-month freedom from clinically-significant CaP (grade group ≥2), radical treatment, metastatic disease and mortality. SEER-registry was queried to evaluate CaP-specific survival in patients undergoing hyperthermia, cryotherapy, or segmental prostatectomy.

resultsAt study entry, the median (IQR) age, PSA and SHIM score were 56.5 (53.1-62.3) years, 4.2 (3.8-5.9) ng/mL and 23 [20-25], respectively. Only 1 patient met the Epstein criteria for active surveillance. All patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years. At 12 months, from a functional standpoint, all patients were continent. Twenty-three (92%) patients were potent at 12 months. From an oncological standpoint, at 36 months, the KM analysis (95% CI) demonstrated a 96.2% (92.9-98.7) rate of freedom from clinically-significant CaP and a 92.7% (88.9-97.2) rate of freedom from radical treatment. All patients were alive and free of metastatic disease at the latest follow-up. Analysis of the SEER-registry data demonstrated 10-year CaP-specific survival rates of 91.6% to 97.7% among the 3 studied modalities, P=0.298.

conclusionsPrecision prostatectomy is feasible, technically safe, and offers excellent postoperative functional results. At 36 months of follow-up, the oncological outcomes and secondary procedure rates appear to be at-par with the ablative forms of focal therapy.

Indexed as

Focal therapyprostate cancer (CaP)prostatectomyrobotics

Identifiers

PMID34430418
PMCPMC8350248
OpenAlexW3167560161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.