Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34430346›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2021

Diagnosis-to-surgery interval and survival for different histologies of stage I-IIA lung cancer.

Lu Zhang, Mei-Chin Hsieh, Lior Rennert, Paige Neroda, Xiao-Cheng Wu, Chindo Hicks, Jiande Wu, Ronald Gimbel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Advances in Intraoperative Flow Cytometry.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lu ZhangDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Mei-Chin HsiehLouisiana Tumor Registry, School of Public Health Sciences, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Lior RennertDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Paige NerodaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Xiao-Cheng WuLouisiana Tumor Registry, School of Public Health Sciences, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Chindo HicksGenetic Department, School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Jiande WuGenetic Department, School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Ronald GimbelDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuidelines on timeliness of lung cancer surgery are inconsistent. Lung cancer histologic subtypes have different prognosis and treatment. It is important to understand the consequences of delayed surgery for each lung cancer histologic subtype. This study aimed to examine the association between diagnosis-to-surgery time interval and survival for early stage lung cancer and selected histologic subtypes.

methodsPatients diagnosed with stage I-IIA lung cancer between 2004 and 2015 receiving definitive surgery and being followed up until Dec. 31, 2018, were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Histologic subtypes included adenocarcinoma, squamous or epidermoid carcinoma, bronchioloalveolar carcinoma, large cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, carcinoid carcinoma, and small cell carcinoma. Diagnosis-to-surgery interval was treated as multi-categorical variables (<1, 1-2, 2-3, and ≥3 months) and binary variables (≥1

resultsWith a median follow-up time of 51 months, a total of 40,612 patients were analyzed, including 40.1% adenocarcinoma and 24.5% squamous or epidermoid carcinoma. The proportion of patients receiving surgery <1, 1-2, 2-3, and ≥3 months from diagnosis were 34.2%, 33.9%, 19.8%, and 12.1%, respectively. Delayed surgery was associated with worse cancer-specific and overall survival for all lung cancers, adenocarcinoma, squamous or epidermoid, bronchioloalveolar, and large cell carcinoma (20-40% increased risk). Dose-dependent effects (longer delay, worse survival) were observed in all lung cancers, adenocarcinoma, and squamous and epidermoid carcinoma. No significant association between surgery delay and survival was observed in adenosquamous, carcinoid, and small cell carcinoma.

conclusionsOur findings support the guidelines of undertaking surgery within 1 month from diagnosis in patients with stage I-IIA lung cancer. The observed dose-dependent effects emphasize the clinical importance of early surgery. Future studies with larger sample size of less frequent histologic subtypes are warranted to provide more evidence for histology-specific lung cancer treatment guidelines.

Indexed as

histologic subtypeLung cancersurgery delaysurvival

Identifiers

PMID34430346
PMCPMC8350104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.