ArticleMethodsX2021
Phenotypic microbial response to antimicrobial exposure conditions with a molecular analysis quantification of species-specific 16S rRNA content.
Article in MethodsX, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rapid Electrochemical-Based PCR-Less Microbial Quantification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling Directly From Blood and Urine With Unknown Microbial Load or Species.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The emergence and rapid spread of resistant bacteria has become a serious public health concern worldwide. Delayed antimicrobial therapy significantly increases mortality in high-risk infections with a particularly strong association with septic shock. Therefore, antimicrobial agents are often injudiciously used without any evidence-based microbiological confirmation. Antimicrobial consumption is strongly linked to the emergence and dissemination of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria strains in several epidemiological studies. According to CDC's recent publication, an estimated 30% of outpatient oral antimicrobial prescriptions may have been inappropriate. A compact and rapid pathogen identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) can assist to address both the unnecessary use and overuse of antimicrobials, and therefore effectively reduce antimicrobial resistance. The overall goal of these AST protocols is to deliver a molecular diagnostic platform that is capable of profiling the antimicrobial susceptibility of causative pathogens in hours, not days. The presented AST utilizes an electrochemical sensor to quantify the microbial changes of 16S rRNA after exposure to various antimicrobial conditions either from clinical isolates or directly from unprocessed clinical specimens such as urine and blood. These protocols can be performed by our robotic lab automation systems or manual benchtop assays with associated reagent kits, AST stripwells and sensor chips.•A rapid, quantifiable antimicrobial efficacy profiling comparable to traditional AST reporting.•Customized antimicrobials and dilution ranges tailored to unique specifications for research and development.•Direct antimicrobial susceptibility of viable pathogen from whole blood, urine, or subculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.