ArticleMethodsX2021
Protocol for microplastic pollution monitoring in freshwater ecosystems: Towards a high-throughput sample processing - MICROPLASTREAM.
Article in MethodsX, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microplastics in mangroves and coral reef ecosystems: a review.Environmental chemistry letters · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robust and reproducible quantification of microplastic pollution in freshwater ecosystems requires the processing of a large amount of samples collected in varying environmental conditions. Such samples are characterized by a high amount of organic matter compared to microplastics and are highly variable in terms of the quantity and the composition of matrices, requiring a standardized analytical protocol for sample treatment and analysis. However, two important and time-consuming steps for microplastic recovery are the elimination of organic matter and microscopic inspection of samples. Here, we developed and validated a protocol, targeting particles with length ranging from 700 µm to 5 mm, that includes a double-step digestion of organic matter, consisting of incubation with potassium hydroxide followed by hydrogen peroxide solutions, and two stereomicroscopic analyses. In addition, we developed several technical improvements allowing reducing the time needed to process samples, such as the design of an adapted filter-cap to improve the content transfer. The absence of physical and chemical alterations in the investigated microplastic pellets and the average reduction of 65.8% (± 9.59 SD) of organic matter in real samples demonstrated that our protocol is fit for purpose. We recommend a second stereomicroscopic analysis to avoid underestimating microplastic concentration and particle size distribution biased towards larger particles. When used for a large-scale monitoring of microplastic pollution, this protocol resulted in an estimated time of 38 h for one person for the treatment of a batch of 24 samples, allowing a higher throughput sample processing and reproducible quantification. •
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.