Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34429774›Full record

ReviewOncology letters2021

Current evidence on laparoscopic vs. open resection for gastric stromal tumours.

Christos Iordanou, Charalampos A Theodoridis, Panagis M Lykoudis, Dimitrios Dimitroulis, Nikolaos Machairas, Eleftherios Spartalis, Pinelopi Kouki, Emmanouil Pikoulis, Nikolaos Nikiteas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncology letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christos IordanouDepartment of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Metropolitan Hospital, 18547 Piraeus, Greece.
Charalampos A TheodoridisThird Department of Surgery, 'Attiko' University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Panagis M LykoudisThird Department of Surgery, 'Attiko' University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Dimitrios DimitroulisSecond Propaedeutic Surgical Department, 'Laiko' Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Nikolaos MachairasSecond Propaedeutic Surgical Department, 'Laiko' Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Eleftherios SpartalisSecond Propaedeutic Surgical Department, 'Laiko' Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Pinelopi KoukiDepartment of Anaesthetics, General District Hospital of Nikaia 'Agios Panteleimon', 18454 Nikaia, Greece.
Emmanouil PikoulisThird Department of Surgery, 'Attiko' University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Nikolaos NikiteasSecond Propaedeutic Surgical Department, 'Laiko' Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the use of laparoscopic surgery is increasing, controversy still surrounds its application for malignant conditions. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are less demanding in terms of lymphadenectomy, meaning that laparoscopic resection might have a more defined benefit when compared with open resection. To the best of our knowledge, no randomized study exists that compares the laparoscopic and open resection of GISTs. The current study aimed to examine the relevant literature by means of a systematic review. A systematic literature search was performed individually by two authors, in which three independent databases were searched using specific search-terms. Titles, abstracts and full texts were screened, as well as references to relevant articles, in order to comprise a comprehensive list of studies. Data were extracted using a detailed pre-agreed spreadsheet. Studies were evaluated according to the modified MINORS criteria. A total of 10 studies were included in the present review, yielding a total of 14 entries. The majority of studies reported significantly improved perioperative outcomes for the laparoscopic approach, including improved duration of operation, blood loss and length of hospital stay. Only four studies reported long-term outcomes and findings that were controversial, with some studies detecting no statistically significant differences, one reporting improved and one reporting worse disease-free and overall survival for the laparoscopic group. Three studies were deemed to be good quality, two of which had not reported significantly different long-term outcomes, while the third had reported significantly improved outcomes in the open resection group. While there is a clear benefit for performing laparoscopic surgery in patients with GIST with regards to perioperative outcomes, when it comes to long-term oncological outcomes, uncertainty over its application remains. The lack of randomized trials, as well as the poor reporting of retrospective studies, limits the amount of evidence that is currently available. Laparoscopic surgery for GIST is certainly safe, feasible and likely cost-effective; however, further studies are required to inform on whether this technique is superior to open resection.

Indexed as

gastrointestinal stromal tumourslaparoscopic surgerylaparoscopyminimally invasive surgeryrecurrencesurvival

Identifiers

PMID34429774
PMCPMC8371957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.