ArticleInfection and drug resistance2021
Differentiating Between an Atypical Hepatic Abscess and Tumor Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Applications and challenges.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Review
- Added value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of recurrent cholangiocarcinoma.Nagoya journal of medical science · 2025Article
- MRI radiomics model differentiates small hepatic metastases and abscesses in periampullary cancer patients.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The diagnostic value of a nomogram based on enhanced CT radiomics for differentiating between intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and early hepatic abscess.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Article
- Comparative efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus B-mode ultrasound in the diagnosis and monitoring of hepatic abscesses.Polish journal of radiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) patterns and conspicuity discrepancies on hepatobiliary phase imaging (HBPI) to distinguish atypical hepatic abscesses from hepatic metastases. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study recruited 31 patients with 43 atypical hepatic abscesses and 32 patients with 35 hepatic metastases who underwent gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. All lesions were confirmed by pathological or clinical diagnosis. For the qualitative and quantitative analyses, the signal intensity, DWI pattern, apparent diffusion coefficient, degree of perilesional edema, perilesional hyperemia, perilesional signal on HBPI, conspicuity, size discrepancy between sequences, contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, and relative enhancement ratio on dynamic phases were independently assessed by two radiologists. Significant findings for differentiating the two groups were identified via univariate and multivariate analyses with a nomogram for predicting atypical hepatic abscesses. The interobserver agreement was also analyzed for each variable.
resultsThe multivariate analysis revealed that the conspicuity discrepancy (odds ratio [OR] 34.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.09-579.47, p = 0.013) and non-peripheral high signal intensity (SI) rim on DWI (OR 67.46, 95% CI 2.64, 1723.20, p = 0.011) were significant independent factors for predicting atypical hepatic abscesses. They were also shown to be high predictor points on the nomogram. When any of the set criteria were satisfied, 97.7% of atypical hepatic abscesses were correctly identified, with a specificity of 65.7%. When both criteria were combined, the specificity was up to 100%, with a sensitivity of 44.9%.
conclusionConspicuity discrepancy and a non-peripheral high SI rim on DWI are reliable and meaningful features that can distinguish atypical hepatic abscesses from hepatic metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.