Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34429594›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2021

Inhaled Dual Phosphodiesterase 3/4 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Patients with COPD: A Short Review.

Clémence Martin, Pierre-Régis Burgel, Nicolas Roche

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Perspectives on Ensifentrine and Its Therapeutic Potential in the Treatment of COPD: Evidence to Date.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2024
    Review
  12. The Ongoing Quest for Predictive Biomarkers in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Ensifentrine as a Novel, Inhaled Treatment for Patients with COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2023
    Review
  15. Pathological Mechanism and Targeted Drugs of COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022
    Review
  16. Cyclic Nucleotide (cNMP) Analogues: Past, Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Clémence MartinAP-HP Centre, Hôpital Cochin, Service de Pneumologie, Paris, France.
Pierre-Régis BurgelAP-HP Centre, Hôpital Cochin, Service de Pneumologie, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0903-9828
Nicolas RocheAP-HP Centre, Hôpital Cochin, Service de Pneumologie, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3162-5033
Inserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current pharmacological treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are mostly limited to inhaled bronchodilators and corticosteroids. Azithromycin can contribute to exacerbation prevention. Roflumilast, a phosphodiesterase (PDE) 4 inhibitor administered orally, also prevents exacerbations in selected patients with chronic bronchitis, recurrent exacerbations, severe airflow limitation and concomitant therapy with long-acting inhaled bronchodilators. This outcome likely results from anti-inflammatory effects since PDE4 is expressed by all inflammatory cell types involved in COPD. The use of this agent is, however, limited by side-effects, particularly nausea and diarrhea. To address remaining unmet needs and enrich therapeutic options for patients with COPD, inhaled dual PDE3/4 inhibitors have been developed, with the aim of enhancing bronchodilation through PDE3 inhibition and modulating inflammation and mucus production though PDE4 inhibition, thus producing a potentially synergistic effect on airway calibre. Experimental preclinical data confirmed these effects in vitro and in animal models. At present, RPL554/ensifentrine is the only agent of this family in clinical development. It decreases sputum markers of both neutrophilic and eosinophilic inflammation in patients with COPD. Clinical Phase II trials confirmed its bronchodilator effect and demonstrated clinically meaningful symptom relief and quality of life improvements in these patients. The safety profile appears satisfactory, with less effects on heart rate and blood pressure than salbutamol and no other side effect. Altogether, these data suggest that ensifentrine could have a role in COPD management, especially in addition to inhaled long-acting bronchodilators with or without corticosteroids since experimental studies suggest potentiation of ensifentrine effects by these agents. However, results from ongoing and future Phase III studies are needed to confirm both beneficial effects and favourable safety profile on a larger scale and assess other outcomes including exacerbations, lung function decline, comorbidities and mortality.

Indexed as

Phosphodiesterase 4 InhibitorsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAnimalsBronchodilator AgentsHumansPhosphodiesterase 3 InhibitorsPhosphoric Diester HydrolasesQuality of LifeBronchodilator AgentsPhosphodiesterase 3 InhibitorsPhosphodiesterase 4 InhibitorsPhosphoric Diester HydrolasesbronchodilationCOPDepitheliuminflammationmucusphosphodiesterase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID34429594
PMCPMC8378910
OpenAlexW3195695312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.