Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34429317›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2021

Systematic review of the factors and the key indicators that identify doctors at risk of complaints, malpractice claims or impaired performance.

Elizabeth E Austin, Vu Do, Ruqaiya Nullwala, Diana Fajardo Pulido, Peter D Hibbert, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Gaston Arnolda, Louise K Wiles, Tahlia Theodorou, Yvonne Tran and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reasonable Cost for Procedures: An Anonymous Survey of Healthcare Providers.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Risk identification and prediction of complaints and misconduct against health practitioners: a scoping review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth E AustinAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia elizabeth.austin@mq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8438-2362
Vu DoAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ruqaiya NullwalaAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Diana Fajardo PulidoAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Peter D HibbertAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7865-343X
Jeffrey BraithwaiteAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0296-4957
Gaston ArnoldaAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4948-7633
Louise K WilesAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Tahlia TheodorouAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Yvonne TranAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Reidar P LystadAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0506-0902
Sarah HatemAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Janet C LongAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0553-682X
Frances RapportAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4428-2826
Annette PantleMedical Council of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Robyn Clay-WilliamsAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6107-7445
Macquarie University · AUUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify the risk factors associated with complaints, malpractice claims and impaired performance in medical practitioners.

designSystematic review. DATA SOURCES: Ovid-Medline, Ovid Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 2011 until March 2020. Reference lists and Google were also handsearched.

resultsSixty-seven peer-reviewed papers and three grey literature publications from 2011 to March 2020 were reviewed by pairs of independent reviewers. Twenty-three key factors identified, which were categorised as demographic or workplace related. Gender, age, years spent in practice and greater number of patient lists were associated with higher risk of malpractice claim or complaint. Risk factors associated with physician impaired performance included substance abuse and burn-out.

conclusionsIt is likely that risk factors are interdependent with no single factor as a strong predictor of a doctor's risk to the public. Risk factors for malpractice claim or complaint are likely to be country specific due to differences in governance structures, processes and funding. Risk factors for impaired performance are likely to be specialty specific due to differences in work culture and access to substances. New ways of supporting doctors might be developed, using risk factor data to reduce adverse events and patient harm. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020182045.

Indexed as

MalpracticeMedicinePhysiciansHumansclinical governancehealth policyhealth & safetyhuman resource managementrisk management

Identifiers

PMID34429317
PMCPMC8386219
OpenAlexW3193903998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.