Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34429312›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Comparison of ultrasound-guided anterior quadratus lumborum block at the lateral supra-arcuate ligament with posterior quadratus lumborum block for perioperative analgesia in laparoscopic nephrectomy: a protocol for a randomised, prospective, parallel group, non-inferior trial.

Xiao Huang, Yuan Sun, Rong Shi, Danxu Ma, Anshi Wu, Yun Wang, Yinan Yang

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiao HuangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yuan SunDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Rong ShiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Danxu MaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Anshi WuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yun WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China wangyun129@ccmu.edu.cn yangyinan@mail.ccmu.edu.cn.
Yinan YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China wangyun129@ccmu.edu.cn yangyinan@mail.ccmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-3847-0679
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAnterior quadratus lumborum block at the lateral supra-arcuate ligament (QLBA) is a new method for postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Perioperative QLBA is effective, but it has not been compared with posterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB2). The present study aims to evaluate the postoperative pain of patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy surgery with QLBA versus QLB2. METHODS/

designThis study is a randomised, prospective, parallel group, non-inferior trial. All patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy surgery will be randomised 1:1 to the QLBA group or the QLB2 group with general anaesthesia. The objective of the trial is to evaluate the postoperative pain of patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy surgery with QLBA (n=50) versus QLB2 (n=50). The primary outcome for this trial is the Visual Analogue Scale scores at rest and activity (dynamic pain scores are assessed with a cough or a trial to sit up in bed) 2 hours after surgery between patients who receive QLBA versus QLB2. The secondary objectives will be to compare (1) pain at rest and activity 0.5 hour, 2 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours after surgery; (2) the time spent on block operation; (3) the blocked dermatomal coverage 5 min and 15 min after block operation; (4) intraoperative opioid consumption; (5) types and doses of the rescue analgesic after surgery; (6) nausea and vomiting score within 24 hours after surgery; (7) time from the end of surgery to the first onset significant pain; (8) patient satisfaction score. DISCUSSION: Clinical experience has supported that QLB is a very effective postoperative analgesic method, and we will answer the following questions in this trial: Will both approaches have the same analgesic effect and duration? Will the QLBA have a non-inferior postoperative analgesic effect compared with QLB2 or the QLBA be able to prolong the duration of analgesia after surgery? The results of this study could have actual clinical applications that could help to reduce postoperative pain and shorten hospital stays. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study design was approved by the ethical committee of Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Beijing, China (2020-ke-321). The trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2000035354.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaLaparoscopyAnesthetics, LocalHumansLigamentsNephrectomyProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUltrasonography, InterventionalAnesthetics, Localadult anaesthesiaanaesthesia in urologypain management

Identifiers

PMID34429312
PMCPMC8386232
OpenAlexW3195068388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.