Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34429154›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2021

CogTale: an online platform for the evaluation, synthesis, and dissemination of evidence from cognitive interventions studies.

Julieta Sabates, Sylvie Belleville, Mary Castellani, Tzvi Dwolatzky, Benjamin M Hampstead, Amit Lampit, Sharon Simon, Kaarin Anstey, Belinda Goodenough, Serafino Mancuso and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Julieta SabatesAcademic, Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Sylvie BellevillePsychology Department, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Mary CastellaniAcademic, Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Tzvi DwolatzkyBruce and Ruth Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Benjamin M HampsteadResearch Program on Cognition and Neuromodulation Based Interventions, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Amit LampitAcademic, Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Sharon SimonCognitive Neuroscience Division, Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Kaarin AnsteyUNSW Ageing Futures Institute, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia.
Belinda GoodenoughDementia Training Australia, Faculty of Science Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Serafino MancusoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Davis MarquesSchool of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Richard SinnottSchool of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Alex Bahar-FuchsAcademic, Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. alex.bahar@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9248-6057

Funding

Research Program on Cognition and Neuromodulation Based Interventions (RP-CNBI)R35AG072262 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HAMPSTEAD, BENJAMIN MICHAEL · 2021 to 2025
$4.2M
NIA NIH HHS R35 AG072262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are critical in health-related decision-making, and are considered the gold standard in research synthesis methods. However, with new trials being regularly published and with the development of increasingly rigorous standards of data synthesis, systematic reviews often require much expertise and long periods of time to be completed. Automation of some of the steps of evidence synthesis productions is a promising improvement in the field, capable of reducing the time and costs associated with the process.This article describes the development and main characteristics of a novel online repository of cognitive intervention studies entitled Cognitive Treatments Article Library and Evaluation (CogTale). The platform is currently in a Beta Release phase, as it is still under development. However, it already contains over 70 studies, and the CogTale team is continuously coding and uploading new studies into the repository. Key features include advanced search options, the capability to generate meta-analyses, and an up-to-date display of relevant published studies.

Indexed as

Meta-Analysis as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicCognitionCognition DisordersHumansCognitive interventionsDementiaEvidence synthesisOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID34429154
PMCPMC8383388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.