ArticleBMC nursing2021
Effectiveness of a 'do not interrupt' vest intervention to reduce medication errors during medication administration: a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial.
Article in BMC nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03062852 (Prévention Des Erreurs médicamenteuses liées Aux Interruptions de tâches Des Soignants Lors de la préparation et de l'Administration Des médicaments), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prévention Des Erreurs médicamenteuses liées Aux Interruptions de tâches Des Soignants Lors de la préparation et de l'Administration Des médicaments : Essai contrôlé randomisé Multicentrique en Clusters
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Assessing the Effectiveness of Interventions Implemented by Nurses to Reduce Medication Administration Errors in Hospitalised Acute Adult Patient Settings: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Pooled it
- Frequency and Associated Factors of Interruptions During the Medication Administration Process Among Nurses in South Korea: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Associations Between Interruptions and Medication Administration Errors Among Nurses in Hospital Settings: A Scoping Review of Quantitative Studies.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Interruptions During IV Smart Pump Medication Administration in Intensive Care Units.Journal of patient safety · 2026Observational
- Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of patient safety culture scale in medication administration.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- The Outcomes of Implementing Logistician Positions on NURSES' Job Satisfaction in Hospitals: A Mixed-Method Study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a medication safety self-assessment tool for primary healthcare settings in China.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Errors Associated With Medication Administration by a Nurse During Hospitalisation: A Prospective Observational Multicentric Study.Nursing open · 2025Observational
- Clinical and economic impact of medication administration errors among neonates in neonatal intensive care units.PloS one · 2024Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of a 'do not interrupt' vest during medication administration rounds is recommended but there have been no controlled randomized studies to evaluate its impact on reducing administration errors. We aimed to evaluate the impact of wearing such a vest on reducing such errors. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the types and potential clinical impact of errors, the association between errors and several risk factors (such as interruptions), and nurses' experiences.
methodsThis was a multicenter, cluster, controlled, randomized study (March-July 2017) in 29 adult units (4 hospitals). Data were collected by direct observation by trained observers. All nurses from selected units were informed. A 'Do not interrupt' vest was implemented in all units of the experimental group. A poster was placed at the entrance of these units to inform patients and relatives. The main outcome was the administration error rate (number of Opportunities for Error (OE), calculated as one or more errors divided by the Total Opportunities for Error (TOE) and multiplied by 100).
resultsWe enrolled 178 nurses and 1346 patients during 383 medication rounds in 14 units in the experimental group and 15 units in the control group. During the intervention period, the administration error rates were 7.09% (188 OE with at least one error/2653 TOE) for the experimental group and 6.23% (210 OE with at least one error/3373 TOE) for the control group (p = 0.192). Identified risk factors (patient age, nurses' experience, nurses' workload, unit exposition, and interruption) were not associated with the error rate. The main error type observed for both groups was wrong dosage-form. Most errors had no clinical impact for the patient and the interruption rates were 15.04% for the experimental group and 20.75% for the control group.
conclusionsThe intervention vest had no impact on medication administration error or interruption rates. Further studies need to be performed taking into consideration the limitations of our study and other risk factors associated with other interventions, such as nurse's training and/or a barcode system.
trial registrationThe PERMIS study protocol (V2-1, 11/04/2017) was approved by institutional review boards and ethics committees (CPP Ile de France number 2016-A00211-50, CNIL 21/03/2017, CCTIRS 11/04/2016). It is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT03062852 , date of first registration: 23/02/2017).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.