Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34429055›Full record

ArticleCurrent neuropharmacology2022

The Role of D

Mikhail Melnikov, Anastasiya Sviridova, Vladimir Rogovskii, Vladimir Kudrin, Vladimir Murugin, Alexey Boyko, Mikhail Pashenkov

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current neuropharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mikhail MelnikovDepartment of Neuroimmunology, Federal Center of Brain research and Neurotechnology of the Federal Medical- Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russia.
Anastasiya SviridovaDepartment of Neuroimmunology, Federal Center of Brain research and Neurotechnology of the Federal Medical- Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russia.
Vladimir RogovskiiDepartment of Neuroimmunology, Federal Center of Brain research and Neurotechnology of the Federal Medical- Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russia.
Vladimir KudrinLaboratory of Neurochemical Pharmacology, V.V. Zakusov Research Institute of Pharmacology, Moscow, Russia.
Vladimir MuruginLaboratory of Clinical Immunology, National Research Center Institute of Immunology of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russia.
Alexey BoykoDepartment of Neuroimmunology, Federal Center of Brain research and Neurotechnology of the Federal Medical- Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russia.
Mikhail PashenkovLaboratory of Clinical Immunology, National Research Center Institute of Immunology of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russia.
Federal Medical-Biological Agency · RUInstitute of Pharmacology Russian Academy of Medical Sciences · RUPirogov Russian National Research Medical University · RU

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 19-75-00075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDopamine is one of the main mediators capable regulate the neuroimmune interaction and is involved in multiple sclerosis (MS) pathogenesis.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to clarify the role of dopamine and its receptors in modulation of Th17-cells in MS.

methods34 relapsing-remitting MS patients and 23 healthy subjects were examined. To assess the effect of dopamine on Th17-cells, CD4+ T-cells were cultured in the presence of dopamine and antagonist or agonist of D

resultsProduction of interleukin-17 (IL-17), interferon-γ (IFN-γ), granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and IL-21 by CD4+ T-cells as well as dopamine were comparable between the groups. Dopamine suppressed cytokine secretion by activated СD4+ T-cells in both groups. Blockade of D1-like dopaminergic receptor with a specific antagonist SCH23390 did not affect dopaminemediated cytokine suppression. In contrast, blockade of D

conclusionThese data suggest an inhibitory role of dopamine on Th17-cells in MS, which could be mediated by the activation of the D

Indexed as

DopamineMultiple SclerosisReceptors, DopamineTh17 CellsDopamine AgonistsGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansInterleukin-17DopamineDopamine AgonistsGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorInterleukin-17Receptors, DopamineDopaminedopaminergic receptorsmultiple sclerosisneuroimmunologyneuropharmacologyTh17-cells

Identifiers

PMID34429055
PMCPMC9881083
OpenAlexW3194663750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.