Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34428971›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2021

The impact of long-term non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 epidemic dynamics and control: the value and limitations of early models.

Marissa L Childs, Morgan P Kain, Mallory J Harris, Devin Kirk, Lisa Couper, Nicole Nova, Isabel Delwel, Jacob Ritchie, Alexander D Becker, Erin A Mordecai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Projecting COVID-19 cases and hospital burden in Ohio.Journal of theoretical biology · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Modelling the first wave of COVID-19 in India.PLoS computational biology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Projecting COVID-19 Cases and Subsequent Hospital Burden in Ohio.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marissa L ChildsEmmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Morgan P KainDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Mallory J HarrisDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Devin KirkDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Lisa CouperDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Nicole NovaDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Isabel DelwelDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Jacob RitchieDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Alexander D BeckerDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Erin A MordecaiDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Funding

MOLECULAR BASIS OF HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONT32AI007328 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JUSTIN L SONNENBURG · 1987 to 2026
$11.9M
Mechanisms of persistent Salmonella infectionR01AI116059 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MONACK, DENISE M · 2015 to 2025
$4.6M
Leveraging environmental drivers to predict vector-borne disease transmissionR35GM133439 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Erin Mordecai · 2019 to 2026
$3.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI116059NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007328NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mathematical models of epidemics are important tools for predicting epidemic dynamics and evaluating interventions. Yet, because early models are built on limited information, it is unclear how long they will accurately capture epidemic dynamics. Using a stochastic SEIR model of COVID-19 fitted to reported deaths, we estimated transmission parameters at different time points during the first wave of the epidemic (March-June, 2020) in Santa Clara County, California. Although our estimated basic reproduction number ([Formula: see text]) remained stable from early April to late June (with an overall median of 3.76), our estimated effective reproduction number ([Formula: see text]) varied from 0.18 to 1.02 in April before stabilizing at 0.64 on 27 May. Between 22 April and 27 May, our model accurately predicted dynamics through June; however, the model did not predict rising summer cases after shelter-in-place orders were relaxed in June, which, in early July, was reflected in cases but not yet in deaths. While models are critical for informing intervention policy early in an epidemic, their performance will be limited as epidemic dynamics evolve. This paper is one of the first to evaluate the accuracy of an early epidemiological compartment model over time to understand the value and limitations of models during unfolding epidemics.

Indexed as

COVID-19EpidemicsBasic Reproduction NumberHumansModels, TheoreticalSARS-CoV-2epidemicsmathematical modelsnon-pharmaceutical interventionsreproduction numberSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34428971
PMCPMC8385372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.