Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34428843›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2022

Effect of Yellow Propolis on Biocompatibility of Cements: Morphological and Immunohistochemistry Analysis.

Izaura Helena Chaves de Meneses, Gêisa Aiane de Morais Sampaio, Rayssa Amaral Vieira, Márcio José da Silva Campos, Polliana Muniz Alves, Matheus Melo Pithon, Rogério Lacerda-Santos

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Izaura Helena Chaves de MenesesDepartment of Dentistry, Dental School, Uniesp Centro Universitario, Cabedelo, Paraíba, Brazil.
Gêisa Aiane de Morais SampaioDepartment of Dentistry, Dental School, University of Pernambuco, Arcoverde, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Rayssa Amaral VieiraGraduate Program in Dentistry, Dental School, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Márcio José da Silva CamposGraduate Program in Dentistry, Dental School, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Polliana Muniz AlvesDepartment of Pathology, Dental School, State University of Paraíba, Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil.
Matheus Melo PithonDepartment of Orthodontics, State University of the Southwest of Bahia, Jéquie, Bahia, Brazil.
Rogério Lacerda-SantosDepartment of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Dental School, Federal University of de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6213-9206

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe focus of this study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of ionomer cements modified with ethanolic extracts of propolis (EEP) in different concentrations and time intervals. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn total, one hundred and thirty-five male Wistar rats were randomized into nine groups: Control, Groups Meron, and Groups Ketac (conventional, and added with 10, 25, 50% EEP, respectively). Histological analyses of inflammatory infiltrate and collagen fibers, and immunohistochemistry of CD68+ for macrophages (MOs) and multinucleated giant cells (MGCs) were performed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn (

resultsIntense inflammatory infiltrate was demonstrated in the cements with 10% EEP at 7 days and 15 days (

conclusionsThe concentration of 10% EEP had the greatest influence on the inflammatory and tissue repair processes. The concentrations of 25 and 50% EEP demonstrated biocompatibility similar to that of cements that did not receive EEP.

Identifiers

PMID34428843
PMCPMC8890933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.