Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34428295›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2021

MitoPhen database: a human phenotype ontology-based approach to identify mitochondrial DNA diseases.

Thiloka E Ratnaike, Daniel Greene, Wei Wei, Alba Sanchis-Juan, Katherine R Schon, Jelle van den Ameele, Lucy Raymond, Rita Horvath, Ernest Turro, Patrick F Chinnery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Thiloka E RatnaikeDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Daniel GreeneDepartment of Haematology, University of Cambridge, NHS Blood and Transplant, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0PT, UK.
Wei WeiDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Alba Sanchis-JuanDepartment of Haematology, University of Cambridge, NHS Blood and Transplant, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0PT, UK.
Katherine R SchonDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Jelle van den AmeeleDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Lucy RaymondDepartment of Medical Genetics, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Rita HorvathDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9841-170X
Ernest TurroDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Patrick F ChinneryDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7065-6617

Funding

European Research Council 309548Medical Research Council G1000848Medical Research Council MC_UU_00015/10Medical Research Council MC_UU_00015/7Medical Research Council MC_UU_00015/9Medical Research Council MR/N010035/1Medical Research Council MR/N025431/1Medical Research Council MR/N025431/2Medical Research Council MR/S005021/1Medical Research Council MR/S035699/1Medical Research Council MR/V009346/1MRC MR/S035699/1Wellcome Trust 109915/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust 212219/Z/18/ZWellcome Trust 219615/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosing mitochondrial disorders remains challenging. This is partly because the clinical phenotypes of patients overlap with those of other sporadic and inherited disorders. Although the widespread availability of genetic testing has increased the rate of diagnosis, the combination of phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity still makes it difficult to reach a timely molecular diagnosis with confidence. An objective, systematic method for describing the phenotypic spectra for each variant provides a potential solution to this problem. We curated the clinical phenotypes of 6688 published individuals with 89 pathogenic mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations, collating 26 348 human phenotype ontology (HPO) terms to establish the MitoPhen database. This enabled a hypothesis-free definition of mtDNA clinical syndromes, an overview of heteroplasmy-phenotype relationships, the identification of under-recognized phenotypes, and provides a publicly available reference dataset for objective clinical comparison with new patients using the HPO. Studying 77 patients with independently confirmed positive mtDNA diagnoses and 1083 confirmed rare disease cases with a non-mitochondrial nuclear genetic diagnosis, we show that HPO-based phenotype similarity scores can distinguish these two classes of rare disease patients with a false discovery rate <10% at a sensitivity of 80%. Enriching the MitoPhen database with more patients will improve predictions for increasingly rare variants.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualBiological OntologiesDNA, MitochondrialHeteroplasmyHumansMitochondrial DiseasesMutationPhenotypeDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID34428295
PMCPMC8464050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.