Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34428283›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2022

Shared Representational Formats for Information Maintained in Working Memory and Information Retrieved from Long-Term Memory.

Vy A Vo, David W Sutterer, Joshua J Foster, Thomas C Sprague, Edward Awh, John T Serences

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Representational formats of human memory traces.Brain structure & function · 2024
    Review
  15. Prefrontal Cortex Codes Representations of Target Identity and Feature Uncertainty.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vy A VoBrain-Inspired Computing, Emerging Technologies Research, Intel Labs, Hillsboro, OR 97124, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9601-1297
David W SuttererDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7977-6861
Joshua J FosterDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Thomas C SpragueDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
Edward AwhDepartment of Psychology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
John T SerencesNeurosciences Graduate Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.

Funding

The Distinction Between Number and Resolution in Visual Working MemoryR01MH087214 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI AWH, EDWARD, VOGEL, EDWARD K · 2009 to 2023
$11.0M
Adaptive population codes for flexible visually-guided behaviorsR01EY025872 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI John T Serences · 2016 to 2026
$4.5M
Effects of behavioral priority on working memory representationsF32EY028438 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI SPRAGUE, THOMAS C · 2017 to 2018
$77k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY028438NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025872NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH087214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current theories propose that the short-term retention of information in working memory (WM) and the recall of information from long-term memory (LTM) are supported by overlapping neural mechanisms in occipital and parietal cortex. However, the extent of the shared representations between WM and LTM is unclear. We designed a spatial memory task that allowed us to directly compare the representations of remembered spatial information in WM and LTM with carefully matched behavioral response precision between tasks. Using multivariate pattern analyses on functional magnetic resonance imaging data, we show that visual memories were represented in a sensory-like code in both memory tasks across retinotopic regions in occipital and parietal cortex. Regions in lateral parietal cortex also encoded remembered locations in both tasks, but in a format that differed from sensory-evoked activity. These results suggest a striking correspondence in the format of representations maintained in WM and retrieved from LTM across occipital and parietal cortex. On the other hand, we also show that activity patterns in nearly all parietal regions, but not occipital regions, contained information that could discriminate between WM and LTM trials. Our data provide new evidence for theories of memory systems and the representation of mnemonic content.

Indexed as

Memory, Long-TermMemory, Short-TermBrain MappingMagnetic Resonance ImagingOccipital LobeParietal LobefMRIlong-term memorymultivariate pattern analysisworking memory

Identifiers

PMID34428283
PMCPMC8889995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.