ArticlePLoS computational biology2021
Ankyrin repeats in context with human population variation.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disrupting the tumor-associated TNKS-USP25 protein-protein interface in cancer: structural basis, druggability, and therapeutic opportunities.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Gankyrin-Protein Interactions in GI Cancers: A Novel Target of New Therapeutics.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2025Review
- LIGYSIS-web: a resource for the analysis of protein-ligand binding sites.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Diversity and structural-functional insights of alpha-solenoid proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Review
- A unified analysis of evolutionary and population constraint in protein domains highlights structural features and pathogenic sites.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Classification of likely functional class for ligand binding sites identified from fragment screening.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Unified access to up-to-date residue-level annotations from UniProtKB and other biological databases for PDB data.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Mutation and selection processes regulating short tandem repeats give rise to genetic and phenotypic diversity across species.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2023Review
- Sequence and Structure-Based Analyses of Human Ankyrin Repeats.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ankyrin protein repeats bind to a wide range of substrates and are one of the most common protein motifs in nature. Here, we collate a high-quality alignment of 7,407 ankyrin repeats and examine for the first time, the distribution of human population variants from large-scale sequencing of healthy individuals across this family. Population variants are not randomly distributed across the genome but are constrained by gene essentiality and function. Accordingly, we interpret the population variants in context with evolutionary constraint and structural features including secondary structure, accessibility and protein-protein interactions across 383 three-dimensional structures of ankyrin repeats. We find five positions that are highly conserved across homologues and also depleted in missense variants within the human population. These positions are significantly enriched in intra-domain contacts and so likely to be key for repeat packing. In contrast, a group of evolutionarily divergent positions are found to be depleted in missense variants in human and significantly enriched in protein-protein interactions. Our analysis also suggests the domain has three, not two surfaces, each with different patterns of enrichment in protein-substrate interactions and missense variants. Our findings will be of interest to those studying or engineering ankyrin-repeat containing proteins as well as those interpreting the significance of disease variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.