Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34428139›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2022

Training Deep Network Ultrasound Beamformers With Unlabeled In Vivo Data.

Jaime Tierney, Adam Luchies, Christopher Khan, Jennifer Baker, Daniel Brown, Brett Byram, Matthew Berger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Clinical, Safety, and Engineering Perspectives on Wearable Ultrasound Technology: A Review.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jaime Tierney
Adam Luchies
Christopher Khan
Jennifer Baker
Daniel Brown
Brett Byram
Matthew Berger

Funding

Suppression and Analysis of Ultrasonic Clutter During Liver Focal Lesion BiopsyR01EB020040 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BYRAM, BRETT C · 2016 to 2019
$1.3M
Parallel Computer with High Memory NodesS10OD016216 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI PISTON, DAVID W · 2013 to 2013
$598k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020040NIH HHS S10 OD016216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional delay-and-sum (DAS) beamforming is highly efficient but also suffers from various sources of image degradation. Several adaptive beamformers have been proposed to address this problem, including more recently proposed deep learning methods. With deep learning, adaptive beamforming is typically framed as a regression problem, where clean ground-truth physical information is used for training. Because it is difficult to know ground truth information in vivo, training data are usually simulated. However, deep networks trained on simulations can produce suboptimal in vivo image quality because of a domain shift between simulated and in vivo data. In this work, we propose a novel domain adaptation (DA) scheme to correct for domain shift by incorporating unlabeled in vivo data during training. Unlike classification tasks for which both input domains map to the same target domain, a challenge in our regression-based beamforming scenario is that domain shift exists in both the input and target data. To solve this problem, we leverage cycle-consistent generative adversarial networks to map between simulated and in vivo data in both the input and ground truth target domains. Additionally, to account for separate as well as shared features between simulations and in vivo data, we use augmented feature mapping to train domain-specific beamformers. Using various types of training data, we explore the limitations and underlying functionality of the proposed DA approach. Additionally, we compare our proposed approach to several other adaptive beamformers. Using the DA DNN beamformer, consistent in vivo image quality improvements are achieved compared to established techniques.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID34428139
PMCPMC8972815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.