ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2022
Training Deep Network Ultrasound Beamformers With Unlabeled In Vivo Data.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical, Safety, and Engineering Perspectives on Wearable Ultrasound Technology: A Review.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional delay-and-sum (DAS) beamforming is highly efficient but also suffers from various sources of image degradation. Several adaptive beamformers have been proposed to address this problem, including more recently proposed deep learning methods. With deep learning, adaptive beamforming is typically framed as a regression problem, where clean ground-truth physical information is used for training. Because it is difficult to know ground truth information in vivo, training data are usually simulated. However, deep networks trained on simulations can produce suboptimal in vivo image quality because of a domain shift between simulated and in vivo data. In this work, we propose a novel domain adaptation (DA) scheme to correct for domain shift by incorporating unlabeled in vivo data during training. Unlike classification tasks for which both input domains map to the same target domain, a challenge in our regression-based beamforming scenario is that domain shift exists in both the input and target data. To solve this problem, we leverage cycle-consistent generative adversarial networks to map between simulated and in vivo data in both the input and ground truth target domains. Additionally, to account for separate as well as shared features between simulations and in vivo data, we use augmented feature mapping to train domain-specific beamformers. Using various types of training data, we explore the limitations and underlying functionality of the proposed DA approach. Additionally, we compare our proposed approach to several other adaptive beamformers. Using the DA DNN beamformer, consistent in vivo image quality improvements are achieved compared to established techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.