ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2021
Genetic and clinical heterogeneity in Korean patients with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome.
Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Wiedemann-Steiner syndrome: description of genetic profiles and clinical phenotypes of 10 Korean pediatric patients.BMC medical genomics · 2025Article
- Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome with ganglioneuroblastoma: a case report and literature review.BMC pediatrics · 2025Review
- Diagnosis and management in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome: first international consensus statement.Journal of medical genetics · 2024Review
- A novel CREBBP mutation and its phenotype in a case of Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome.BMC medical genomics · 2022Article
- Genetic Diagnosis of Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome With Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) and Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES): Case Series With a NovelFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Genetic and clinical heterogeneity in Korean patients with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRubinstein-Taybi syndrome (RSTS) is a rare congenital malformation syndrome with clinical characteristics such as hypertrichosis, high arched eyebrows, large beaked nose, and broad thumbs and halluces. RSTS patients showed intellectual disability and health problems such as short stature, ophthalmologic abnormalities, congenital heart defects, genitourinary defects, and variable types of tumors. Although mutations in CREBBP and EP300 genes are associated with RSTS features, genetic causation is still unknown in 30% of patients.
methodsWe present clinical and molecular genetic characteristics of 25 unrelated Korean patients clinically diagnosed with RSTS. Sanger sequencing analysis and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification for CREBBP in 25 patients and exome sequencing of CREBBP-negative cases were performed in nine patients successively.
resultsCausative variants were identified in 20 (80%) patients: 16 (64%) in CREBBP and 4 (16%) in EP300. All the identified variants predict protein truncation (11 frameshift, 2 nonsense, 1 splicing-site, and 6 large intragenic deletions); there are no repeatedly identified sequence variants. Four of the CREBBP and all four EP300 variants are novel. Intellectual disability was noted in 24/25 patients (96%); no difference was found between CREBBP and EP300 groups. One patient with a CREBBP variant (4%) had malignant tumor.
conclusionsTo date, this is the largest cohort of patients with RSTS including EP300-related patients in Korea. Future large-scale studies to find genetic mutation of molecularly unsolved patients and long-term prospective studies are required to validate our results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.