Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34427892›Full record

ArticleSpine deformity2022

Does nutrition consultation in the year leading up to neuromuscular scoliosis surgery result in significant weight gain, or just a larger magnitude curve?

Ariana T Meltzer-Bruhn, Matthew R Landrum, David A Spiegel, Patrick J Cahill, Jason B Anari, Keith D Baldwin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Spine deformity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ariana T Meltzer-BruhnPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Matthew R LandrumDepartment of Orthopedics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David A SpiegelDepartment of Orthopedics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Patrick J CahillDepartment of Orthopedics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jason B AnariDepartment of Orthopedics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Keith D BaldwinDepartment of Orthopedics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA. baldwink@email.chop.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2333-9061
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients with neuromuscular scoliosis undergoing posterior instrumented spinal fusion can be underweight, malnourished, and have higher complication rates. A nutrition consult is common in this population and it is unclear if weight gain occurs from the consult or surgery. The purpose of the study was to determine if nutrition consultation in the year prior to spinal fusion resulted in significant differences in weight gain or percentile on the CP growth chart. The secondary aim was to determine if there would be deformity progression during that time.

methodsRetrospective chart and radiograph review was performed for all patients with neuromuscular spinal deformity treated with posterior instrumented spinal fusion at one institution between January 1, 2009 and August 1, 2015. Inclusion criteria included < 20 years old, diagnosis of neuromuscular scoliosis, and 1-year pre-operative percentile on the CP growth chart < 50. Patient demographics, GMFCS level, weight, percentile on appropriate CP growth chart, major curve and pelvic obliquity at 1 year pre-operatively and at surgery were recorded.

resultsSixty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. Thirty-seven patients had a nutrition appointment within 1 year pre-operatively, 31 patients did not. There were no significant differences between the groups when comparing increase in weight (p = 0.9), percentile on CP growth charts (p = 0.3), major deformity (p = 0.1), and pelvic obliquity (p = 0.2). Overall, there was a mean 3.2 kg weight gain, 5.2% increase on CP growth charts, 40° increase in major curve, and 5° worsening of pelvic obliquity in the year before surgery. There was an average overall increase in the pre-operative albumin value, but this was not different between groups (p = 0.6). Children who were tube fed gained on average 10.8 percentiles on the CP growth chart, whereas children without gained only 0.5 percentiles (p = 0.002).

conclusionsNutrition consultations in the year preceding posterior instrumented spinal fusion do not lead to weight optimization prior to surgery in comparison to patients without nutrition consults. Gastrostomy tubes were found to be helpful for weight optimization and should be considered as an alternative nutrition option in pre-operative planning in underweight patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III-therapeutic study: retrospective comparative study.

Indexed as

ScoliosisAdultChildHumansReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWeight GainYoung AdultGastrostomy tubeNeuromuscular scoliosisNutrition consultsPosterior spinal fusionWeight gain

Identifiers

PMID34427892
OpenAlexW3195607966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.