Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34427889›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2022

Random mutagenesis in vegetatively propagated crops: opportunities, challenges and genome editing prospects.

Mahpara Kashtwari, Sheikh Mansoor, Aijaz A Wani, Mushtaq Ahmad Najar, Rupesh K Deshmukh, Faheem Shehzad Baloch, Ishfaq Abidi, Sajad Majeed Zargar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Optimized gamma radiation produces physiological and morphological changes that improve seed yield in wheat.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mahpara KashtwariCytogenetics and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Kashmir, Hazratbal, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, 190006, India.
Sheikh MansoorDivision of Biochemistry, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, FBSc, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, 180009, India.
Aijaz A WaniCytogenetics and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Kashmir, Hazratbal, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, 190006, India. aijazbotku@gmail.com.
Mushtaq Ahmad NajarCytogenetics and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Kashmir, Hazratbal, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, 190006, India.
Rupesh K DeshmukhNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute (NABI), Mohali, Punjab, 140308, India.
Faheem Shehzad BalochFaculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technologies, Sivas University of Science and Technology, Sivas, Turkey.
Ishfaq AbidiDirectorate of Research, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Shalimar, Jammu and Kashmir, 190025, India.
Sajad Majeed ZargarProteomics Laboratory, Division of Plant Biotechnology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Shalimar, Jammu and Kashmir, 190025, India. smzargar@skuastkashmir.ac.in.
University of Kashmir · INSher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir · INNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute · INSher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu · INSivas Bilim ve Teknoloji Üniversitesi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to meet the growing human food and nutrition demand a perpetual process of crop improvement is idealized. It has seen changing trends and varying concepts throughout human history; from simple selection to complex gene-editing. Among these techniques, random mutagenesis has been shown to be a promising technology to achieve desirable genetic gain with less time and minimal efforts. Over the decade, several hundred varieties have been released through random mutagenesis, but the production is falling behind the demand. Several food crops like banana, potato, cassava, sweet potato, apple, citrus, and others are vegetatively propagated. Since such crops are not propagated through seed, genetic improvement through classical breeding is impractical for them. Besides, in the case of polyploids, accomplishment of allelic homozygosity requires a considerable land area, extensive fieldwork with huge manpower, and hefty funding for an extended period of time. Apart from induction, mapping of induced genes to facilitate the knowledge of biological processes has been performed only in a few selected facultative vegetative crops like banana and cassava which can form a segregating population. During the last few decades, there has been a shift in the techniques used for crop improvement. With the introduction of the robust technologies like meganucleases, zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) more and more crops are being subjected to gene editing. However, more work needs to be done in case of vegetatively propagated crops.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingCrops, AgriculturalGenome, PlantMutagenesisPlant BreedingPlants, Genetically ModifiedCRISPRGamma raysGene editingMutagenesisSaffronSterile crops

Identifiers

PMID34427889
OpenAlexW3195882297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.