ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2021
Bone induction and defect repair by true bone ceramics incorporated with rhBMP-2 and Sr.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Bone Morphogenetic Protein Agonist Small Molecule, SB4, on Osteogenic Differentiation of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Journal of bone metabolism · 2026Article
- Research Progress of Bone Grafting: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Bioactive Porous Composite Implant Guides Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation and Migration to Accelerate Bone Reconstruction.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Article
- Recent Advance of Strontium Functionalized in Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Dual-Nozzle 3D Printed Nano-Hydroxyapatite Scaffold Loaded with Vancomycin Sustained-Release Microspheres for Enhancing Bone Regeneration.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo study the bone induction and defect repair of true bone ceramics (TBC) combined with rhBMP-2 and Sr.
methodsMC3T3-E1 cells were used to evaluate the bioactivity of the composite. Cell proliferation activity was detected by CCK-8, ALP activity was detected by p-nitrophenyl phosphate (PNPP), and the differences of material surface topography were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Bone induction was verified by the implantation in nude mice. The rabbit femoral condyle defect model was achieved to verify the bone defect repair ability of the material.
resultsSEM results showed nearly the same surface morphology and cell proliferation quantified by CCK-8 showed that compared with TBC, both TBC&Sr and TBC&BMP-2&Sr had a significant promoting effect (P < 0.05). ALP activity result showed that the ALP activity of TBC&BMP-2&Sr was significantly higher than that of TBC alone (P < 0.05). The bone induction result showed that TBC&Sr had a small amount of new bone formation, and the new bone area was only 2.5 ± 0.11%. The bone induction activity of TBC&BMP-2&Sr was the highest, the new bone area was up to 75.36 ± 4.21%. Histological result of bone defect repair showed that TBC&BMP-2&Sr was also the highest, the new bone area was up to 72.42 ± 3.14%. The repair effect of TBC& BMP-2 was second, and better than that of TBC&Sr.
conclusionTBC combined with rhBMP-2 and Sr had the good bioactivity, obvious bone conduction and bone defect repair performance, laying the foundation of clinical application potentially.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.