Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34427757›Full record

SynthesisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2021

Current role of intraoperative sensing technology in total knee arthroplasty.

Cécile Batailler, John Swan, Elliot Sappey Marinier, Elvire Servien, Sébastien Lustig

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Smart sensor implant technology in total knee arthroplasty.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cécile BataillerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sport Medicine, Croix-Rousse Hospital, 103 grande rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69004, Lyon, France.
John SwanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sport Medicine, Croix-Rousse Hospital, 103 grande rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69004, Lyon, France.
Elliot Sappey MarinierDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sport Medicine, Croix-Rousse Hospital, 103 grande rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69004, Lyon, France.
Elvire ServienDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sport Medicine, Croix-Rousse Hospital, 103 grande rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69004, Lyon, France.
Sébastien LustigDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sport Medicine, Croix-Rousse Hospital, 103 grande rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69004, Lyon, France. sebastien.lustig@gmail.com.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRHôpital de la Croix-Rousse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSensors have been introduced within the last 10 years to quantify soft tissue balancing during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to give the surgeon objective data. These devices are fairly new and their impact on patient outcome remains uncertain. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize all the relevant surgical and clinical results of sensors for TKA.

methodsA PRISMA systematic review was conducted using five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, GOOGLE SCHOLAR, and the COCHRANE LIBRARY) to identify all available literature that described the surgical and clinical results of sensors for TKA between 2000 and 2021. The main investigated outcome criteria were intraoperative data, postoperative functional and clinical outcome, knee range of motion, complications and revision rates.

resultsTwenty-seven articles were finally included. The maximum reported follow-up was 26 months. A balanced knee with sensor corresponded to a mediolateral difference inferior to 15 lb and a stable posterior drawer test. The standard assessment of knee balance was a poor predictor of the true soft tissue balance when compared to sensor data. At least 60% of TKA needed an additional rebalancing procedure with the sensor, after conventional gap balancing. Achieving a quantitatively balanced knee resulted in a significantly higher patient satisfaction score. But the prospective comparative studies found no demonstrable improvement in clinical outcome, range of motion or complication rate at one year postoperatively for patients undergoing TKA using sensor-guided balancing compared with routine techniques.

conclusionEven though the use of the intraoperative sensing technology was not related to an improvement in clinical outcome, the current studies showed that using sensors facilitates the reproduction of natural joint stability, and improves the rate of achieving a balanced knee. Sensor use in complex cases could be particularly valuable, but their use in standard practice remains to be defined.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisOsteoarthritis, KneeHumansKnee JointProspective StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularTechnologyInstabilityLigament balancingSensorTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID34427757
OpenAlexW3194083289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.