Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34427754›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2022

PERMIT study: a global pooled analysis study of the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel in routine clinical practice.

Vicente Villanueva, Wendyl D'Souza, Hiroko Goji, Dong Wook Kim, Claudio Liguori, Rob McMurray, Imad Najm, Estevo Santamarina, Bernhard J Steinhoff, Pavel Vlasov and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Effectiveness and safety of Perampanel in refractory status epilepticus: a case series.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 12 institutions in 11 countries.

Vicente VillanuevaRefractory Epilepsy Unit, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain. villanueva_vichab@gva.es.
Wendyl D'SouzaDepartment of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1750-5131
Hiroko GojiNeuropsychiatric Department, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan.
Dong Wook KimDepartment of Neurology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Claudio LiguoriEpilepsy Centre, Neurology Unit, University Hospital "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2845-1332
Rob McMurrayEuropean Knowledge Centre, Eisai Europe Ltd, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
Imad NajmCleveland Clinic Epilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Estevo SantamarinaEpilepsy Unit, Hospital Universitari Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1915-0335
Bernhard J SteinhoffKork Epilepsy Center, Kehl-Kork, Germany.
Pavel VlasovDepartment of Neurology, General Medical Faculty of Moscow State University of Dentistry named after A.I. Evdokimov, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8321-5864
Tony WuChang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Medical Center and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Eugen TrinkaDepartment of Neurology, Christian-Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Affiliated EpiCARE Partner, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5950-2692
PERMIT pooled analysis participants
Aichi Medical University · JPChang Gung University · TWCleveland Clinic · USEisai (United Kingdom) · GBHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESKonkuk University · KRMoscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry · RUParacelsus Medical University · ATThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Freiburg · DEUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The PERaMpanel pooled analysIs of effecTiveness and tolerability (PERMIT) study was a pooled analysis of data from 44 real-world studies from 17 countries, in which people with epilepsy (PWE; focal and generalized) were treated with perampanel (PER). Retention and effectiveness were assessed after 3, 6, and 12 months, and at the last visit (last observation carried forward). Effectiveness assessments included 50% responder rate (≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency from baseline) and seizure freedom rate (no seizures since at least the prior visit); in PWE with status epilepticus, response was defined as seizures under control. Safety and tolerability were assessed by evaluating adverse events (AEs) and discontinuation due to AEs. The Full Analysis Set included 5193 PWE. Retention, effectiveness and safety/tolerability were assessed in 4721, 4392 and 4617, respectively. Retention on PER treatment at 3, 6, and 12 months was 90.5%, 79.8%, and 64.2%, respectively. Mean retention time on PER treatment was 10.8 months. The 50% responder rate was 58.3% at 12 months and 50.0% at the last visit, and the corresponding seizure freedom rates were 23.2% and 20.5%, respectively; 52.7% of PWE with status epilepticus responded to PER treatment. Overall, 49.9% of PWE reported AEs and the most frequently reported AEs (≥ 5% of PWE) were dizziness/vertigo (15.2%), somnolence (10.6%), irritability (8.4%), and behavioral disorders (5.4%). At 12 months, 17.6% of PWEs had discontinued due to AEs. PERMIT demonstrated that PER is effective and generally well tolerated when used to treat people with focal and/or generalized epilepsy in everyday clinical practice.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsNitrilesDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansPyridonesTreatment OutcomeAnticonvulsantsNitrilesperampanelPyridonesAntiseizure medicationEffectivenessFocal epilepsyGeneralized epilepsyObservational studyTolerability

Identifiers

PMID34427754
PMCPMC8940799
OpenAlexW3194728825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.