Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34427688›Full record

ReviewJournal of rehabilitation medicine2021

Adaptations for rehabilitation services during the COVID-19 pandemic proposed by scientific organizations and rehabilitation professionals.

Luz H Lugo-Agudelo, Kelly Mariana Cruz Sarmiento, Maria Alejandra Spir Brunal, Juan Carlos Velásquez Correa, Ana Maria Posada Borrero, Luisa Fernanda Mesa Franco, Rosarita Di Dio Castagna Ianini, Paola Andrea Ramírez Pérez Lis, Claudia Marcela Vélez, Daniel F Patiño Lugo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Clinical standards for diagnosis, treatment and prevention of post-COVID-19 lung disease.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Scoping review of rehabilitation care models for post COVID-19 condition.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Luz H Lugo-AgudeloHealth Rehabilitation Group and Academic Group of Clinical Epidemiology, University of Antioquia, Antioquia, Colombia. E-mail: luzh.lugo@gmail.com.
Kelly Mariana Cruz Sarmiento
Maria Alejandra Spir Brunal
Juan Carlos Velásquez Correa
Ana Maria Posada Borrero
Luisa Fernanda Mesa Franco
Rosarita Di Dio Castagna Ianini
Paola Andrea Ramírez Pérez Lis
Claudia Marcela Vélez
Daniel F Patiño Lugo
Christoph Gutenbrunner
Universidad de Antioquia · COMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe adaptations in the provision of rehabilitation services proposed by scientific and professional rehabilitation organizations to avoid interruptions to patients rehabilitation process and delays in starting rehabilitation in patients with COVID-19.

methodsA narrative review approach was used to identify the recommendations of scientific and professional organizations in the area of rehabilitation. A systematic search was performed in the main data-bases in 78 international and regional web portals of rehabilitation organizations. A total of 21 publications from these organizations were identified and selected.

resultsThe results are presented in 4 categories: adequacy of inpatient services, including acute care services and intensive care unit for patients with and without COVID-19; adequacy of outpatient services, including home-based rehabilitation and tele-rehabilitation; recommendations to prevent the spread of COVID-19; and regulatory standards and positions during the COVID-19 pandemic expressed by organizations for protecting the rights of health workers and patients.

conclusionHealth systems around the world are rapidly learning from actions aimed at the reorganization of rehabilitation services for patients who are in the process of recovery from acute or chronic conditions, and the rapid response to the rehabilitation of survivors of COVID-19, as well as from efforts in the prevention of contagion of those providing the services.

Indexed as

PandemicsRehabilitationCOVID-19Health PersonnelHumansPatient Care TeamPhysical and Rehabilitation MedicineSARS-CoV-2SurvivorsCOVID-19disabilityhealth professionalhealth systemrehabilitation organizationrehabilitation service

Identifiers

PMID34427688
PMCPMC8638723
OpenAlexW3194853993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.