ArticleJAMA network open2021
Assessment of the Diagnostic Efficiency of a Liquid Biopsy Assay for Early Detection of Gastric Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health Economic Evidence and Modeling Challenges for Liquid Biopsy Assays in Cancer Management: A Systematic Literature Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2023Pooled it
- Liquid biopsies for the diagnosis of early-stage gastric cancer: A 5-year systematic review.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Review
- Exosomal P4HA3: a promising biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis in gastric cancer.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Liquid biopsy biomarkers for early detection of gastrointestinal cancers: Current landscape and emerging technologies.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Liquid biopsy, multi-cancer early detection, and artificial intelligence: new frontiers in cancer screening from a technological and immunological perspective.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- From inflammation to carcinogenesis: MiRNA regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition to facilitate malignant progression of gastric precancerous lesions.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Urinary metabolomics-based machine learning for diagnosis of early gastric neoplasia: a retrospective diagnostic case-control study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- From Tumor Biology to Clinical Perspectives: Novel Biomarkers and Therapeutic Insights in Gastric Cancer.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Extracellular Vesicle-Derived microRNAs: Novel Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Gastrointestinal Malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Cell-free and extracellular vesicle microRNAs with clinical utility for solid tumors.Molecular oncology · 2025Review
- Development and clinical applications of liquid biopsy assays in cancer screening.Translational cancer research · 2025Review
- Trends in Stomach Cancer Burden in China: A Joinpoint and APC Analysis Based on GBD 2021.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Article
- Blood-based machine learning classifiers for early diagnosis of gastric cancerWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Novel and Effective Blood-Based miRNA Diagnostic Panel for Gastric Cancer: A Pilot Study in a Japanese Population.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- A Pilot Study on the Analysis of Circulating miRNA Upregulation in Laryngeal Cancer.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Liquid biopsy in gastric cancer: A snapshot of the current state of the art.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
- Liquid biopsy in gastrointestinal oncology: clinical applications and translational integration of ctDNA, CTCs, and sEVs.Oncology reviews · 2025Review
- Transcriptomics-Based Liquid Biopsy for Early Detection of Recurrence in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Liquid Biopsy: An Emerging Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Predictive Tool in Gastric Cancer.Journal of gastric cancer · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Noninvasive detection of early-stage disease is a key strategy for reducing gastric cancer (GC)-associated patient mortality. Objective: To establish a novel, noninvasive, microRNA (miRNA)-based signature for the early detection of GC using a comprehensive biomarker discovery approach with retrospective and prospective validation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study was conducted in 4 phases using publicly available genome sequences and tissue samples from patients at an academic medical center in Japan, and validated with retrospective multicenter cohorts of patients with GC. Three tissue miRNA data sets were used to identify a miRNA signature that discriminated GC vs normal tissues. The robustness of this signature was assessed in serum from 2 retrospective cohorts of patients with GC. A risk-scoring model was derived, then the performance of the miRNA signature was evaluated in a prospective cohort of patients with GC. The robustness of the miRNA signature was compared with current blood-based markers, and a cost-effectiveness analysis of the miRNA signature against the current practice of endoscopy was performed. All clinical samples used for this study were collected and data analyzed between April 1997 and March 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Assessment of diagnostic efficiency on the basis of area under the curve (AUC), specificity, and sensitivity. Results: The data sets for the genome-wide expression profiling analysis stage included 598 total patient samples (284 [55.4%] from men; mean [SE] patient age, 65.7 [0.5] years). The resulting 10-miRNA signature was validated in 2 retrospective GC serum cohorts (586 patients; 348 [59.4%] men, mean [SE] age, 66.0 [0.7] years), which led to the establishment of a 5-miRNA signature (AUC, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.94) that also exhibited high levels of diagnostic performance in patients with stage I disease (AUC, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.94). A risk-scoring model was derived and the assay was optimized to a minimal number of miRNAs. The performance of the resulting 3-miRNA signature was then validated in a prospective cohort of patients with GC (349 patients; 124 [70.5%] men, median [range] age, 66.0 [0.66] years). The final 3-miRNA signature (miR-18a, miR-181b, and miR-335) exhibited high diagnostic accuracy in all stages of patients (AUC, 0.86; 95% CI 0.83-0.90), including in patients with stage I disease (AUC, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79-0.91). Furthermore, this miRNA signature was superior to currently used blood markers and outperformed the endoscopic screening in a cost-effectiveness analysis (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, CNY ¥16162.5 per quality-adjusted life-year [USD $2304.80 per quality-adjusted life-year]). Conclusions and Relevance: These results suggest the potential clinical significance of the 3-miRNA signature as a noninvasive, cost-effective, and facile assay for the early detection of GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.