ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021
Automatic Localization of the Scleral Spur Using Deep Learning and Ultrasound Biomicroscopy.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development trajectory and trends of ultrasound biomicroscopy in glaucoma research: a comprehensive 20-year bibliometric analysis.International ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Network architecture optimization for ophthalmic ultrasound image detection based on modular ablation of multi-version YOLO.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Article
- ACM-Assessor: An Artificial Intelligence System for Assessing Angle Closure Mechanisms in Ultrasound Biomicroscopy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based normative database of anterior chamber dimensions for angle closure assessment: the Singapore Chinese Eye Study.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based anterior segment identification and parameter assessment of primary angle closure disease in ultrasound biomicroscopy images.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Applying deep learning to recognize the properties of vitreous opacity in ophthalmic ultrasound images.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Multimodal Biometric Parameters for Diagnosing Acute Angle Closure Secondary to Lens Subluxation.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Article
- Automatic measurement of anterior chamber angle parameters in AS-OCT images using deep learning.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence and big data integration in anterior segment imaging for glaucoma.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) for automated localization of the scleral spur in ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) images of open-angle eyes. Methods: UBM images were acquired, and one glaucoma specialist provided reference coordinates of scleral spur locations in all images. A CNN model based on the EfficientNetB3 architecture was developed to detect the scleral spur in each image. The prediction errors and Euclidean distance were used to evaluate localization performance of the CNN model. Trabecular-iris angle 500 (TIA500) and angle-opening distance 500 (AOD500) were measured and analyzed using the scleral spur locations provided by the specialist and predicted by the CNN model. Results: The CNN was developed using a training dataset of 2328 images and tested using an independent dataset of 258 images. The mean absolute prediction errors of CNN model were 48.06 ± 45.40 µm for X-coordinates and 30.84 ± 27.03 µm for Y-coordinates. The mean absolute intraobserver variability was 47.80 ± 44.45 µm for X-coordinates and 29.50 ± 25.77 µm for Y-coordinates. The mean Euclidean distance of the CNN was 60.41 ± 49.02 µm and the intraobserver mean Euclidean distance was 59.78 ± 47.12 µm. The mean absolute error in TIA500 was 1.26 ± 1.38 degrees for all test images and in AOD500 was 0.039 ± 0.051 mm. Conclusions: A CNN can detect the scleral spur on UBM images of open-angle eyes with performance similar to that of a glaucoma specialist. Translational Relevance: Deep learning algorithms for automating scleral spur localization would facilitate the quantitative assessment of the opening of the angle and the risk in angle closure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.