Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34427517›Full record

ArticlemSystems2021

The Future of (Soil) Microbiome Studies: Current Limitations, Integration, and Perspectives.

Stefan Geisen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Impact of mineral fertilization andFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Soil mycobiome in sustainable agriculture.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stefan GeisenLaboratory of Nematology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbes dominate the planet's biodiversity in terms of species number and by driving essential Earth system functions such as the carbon cycle. Soils contain most of this microbial biodiversity. Only recently, we have started to better understand the diversity of bacteria and fungi at the global scale. Here, I list my views on some shortcomings of contemporary soil microbiome studies and potential solutions to overcome them. In particular, I highlight that (soil) microbiome studies should become more holistic in terms of (i) taxa and resolution targeted, (ii) by adding functional to taxonomic information, and (iii) by integrating temporal analysis into spatial analyses. Considering those elements with the methodology that is now available will advance our understanding on (soil) microbiomes to reliably address major ecological hypotheses and to advance insights into the importance for life on Earth.

Indexed as

food websmicrobiomeprotistssoil microbiologytrophic interactions

Identifiers

PMID34427517
PMCPMC8407325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.