Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34427477›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society2022

Why hospital design matters: A narrative review of built environments research relevant to stroke care.

Julie Bernhardt, Ruby Lipson-Smith, Aaron Davis, Marcus White, Heidi Zeeman, Natalie Pitt, Michelle Shannon, Maria Crotty, Leonid Churilov, Marie Elf

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Why the spaces in which we deliver care matter: implications and recommendations for general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Julie BernhardtStroke, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia.
Ruby Lipson-SmithStroke, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1702-8144
Aaron DavisStroke, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia.
Marcus WhiteCentre for Design Innovation, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorne, Australia.
Heidi ZeemanMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
Natalie PittSilver Thomas Hanley (STH) Health Architecture, Australia.
Michelle ShannonStroke, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia.
Maria CrottyFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Leonid ChurilovMelbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Marie ElfSchool of Education, Health and Social Studies, University of Dalarna, Falun, Sweden.
Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health · AUDalarna University · SEFlinders University · AUGriffith University · AUSwinburne University of Technology · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare facilities are among the most expensive buildings to construct, maintain, and operate. How building design can best support healthcare services, staff, and patients is important to consider. In this narrative review, we outline why the healthcare environment matters and describe areas of research focus and current built environment evidence that supports healthcare in general and stroke care in particular. Ward configuration, corridor design, and staff station placements can all impact care provision, staff and patient behavior. Contrary to many new ward design approaches, single-bed rooms are neither uniformly favored, nor strongly evidence-based, for people with stroke. Green spaces are important both for staff (helping to reduce stress and errors), patients and relatives, although access to, and awareness of, these and other communal spaces is often poor. Built environment research specific to stroke is limited but increasing, and we highlight emerging collaborative multistakeholder partnerships (Living Labs) contributing to this evidence base. We believe that involving engaged and informed clinicians in design and research will help shape better hospitals of the future.

Indexed as

Hospital Design and ConstructionStrokeBuilt EnvironmentHospitalsHumansevidence-based designhospital design and constructionStrokestroke rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID34427477
PMCPMC8969212
OpenAlexW3195967819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.