Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34427254›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2021

Online survey on practice patterns in the treatment of corneal ulcer during COVID-19 pandemic.

Amit Raj, Prabhakar Singh, Neha Chaudhary

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amit RajDepartment of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.
Prabhakar SinghDepartment of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.
Neha ChaudharyDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate practice patterns in the treatment of corneal ulcer by ophthalmologists during COVID-19 pandemic in the Indian subcontinent.

methodsThis was an online questionnaire-based survey circulated via google form to reach ophthalmologists practising cornea as a subspeciality between January 4, 2021 and February 3, 2021. The survey comprised of 21 questions to evaluate the prevailing practice patterns in corneal ulcer management during pandemic.

resultsIn total, 39.3% of government ophthalmology clinics and 41.5% of private ophthalmology clinics reported an average delay of 2 weeks in presenting to the hospital after the onset of symptoms. Totally, 60.5% of participants reported that the clinical outcomes of infectious keratitis cases during the COVID-19 pandemic were worse than before. In total, 61.3 and 41.1% of ophthalmologists in private and government sectors, respectively, were routinely performing corneal scrapings for corneal ulcer patients. The procedures were performed with adequate protective measures. In total, 68.5% participants mentioned decreased availability of donor cornea during the pandemic, and 44.4% reported compromised cornea practice due to the limited availability of essentials (tissue adhesives, BCLs, medications, etc.). A statistically significant difference of effect of pandemic on cost of services was noted between government and private hospitals. In total, 51% participants from private hospitals reported hike in outpatient department services and surgical charges, and 78.6% from government hospitals mentioned no hike in the charges (P value <0.001).

conclusionThis study provides an overview on modified strategies in corneal ulcer management during pandemic without compromising patient safety and quality care.

Indexed as

Corneal UlcerCOVID-19HumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCorneal ulceronline surveypractice pattern

Identifiers

PMID34427254
PMCPMC8544106
OpenAlexW3195009895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.