ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2021
Ten-year outcome of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-World 10-Year Outcomes of Anti-VEGF Therapy for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis.Clinical & experimental ophthalmologyPooled it
- Maculopathies: A Systematic Literature Review on Pathophysiology, Public Health, and Treatment.Cureus · 2024Review
- Impact of COVID-19 Confinement on Quality of Life of Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Two-Wave Panel Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to report the 10-year visual outcome in eyes treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and to assess the impact of switching treatment as part of routine clinical care.
methodsElectronic records of treatment-naïve eyes initiated on intravitreal ranibizumab between January and December 2009 were accessed. The primary outcome measured was the change in visual acuity (VA) in Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters. The frequency and reasons for treatment discontinuation during each year of follow-up and the impact of switching from ranibizumab to aflibercept were some of the secondary outcomes.
resultsOf the 223 eyes (203 patients), 60 eyes completed 10 years of continuous follow-up. After a mean follow-up of 121.4 months, VA declined by 5.6 letters (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.25 to -11.1, P = 0.04). Final VA of ≥70 letters was seen in 20% of eyes and 35% had VA ≤ 35 letters. VA gain of ≥10 letters was seen in 23% and loss of ≥10 letters was seen in 40% of the eyes. Twenty-nine eyes remained on ranibizumab monotherapy and 31 switched to aflibercept. Switched eyes showed a visual decline of 7.1 letters (5.5 letters in monotherapy eyes, P = 0.32) and received a significantly higher number of injections (39.6 ± 9.9 vs. 24.4 ± 13.1, P < 0.0001). Patients discontinuing treatment were older and had lower baseline vision compared to completers.
conclusionVA declined below the baseline after 10 years of follow-up and switching did not have any effect on the final visual outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.