ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2021
Initial experience with three-dimensional heads-up display system for cataract surgery - A comparative study.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06264830 (Comparing the Effect of Depth of Focus Difference in High Myopic Patients Receiving Cataract Operations Between 3D Visualization System and Traditional Optical Microscope.), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparing the Effect of Depth of Focus Difference in High Myopic Patients Receiving Cataract Operations Between 3D Visualization System and Traditional Optical Microscope.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing microscope light-associated glare and comfort between heads-up 3D digital and conventional microscopes in cataract surgery: a randomised, multicentre, single-blind, controlled trial.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2023Trial
- Comparison of three-dimensional surgical system versus binocular microscope for implantable Collamer lens implantation: a randomized clinical trial.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Comparison of neck angle and musculoskeletal discomfort of surgeon in cataract surgery between three-dimensional heads-up display system and conventional microscope.Scientific reports · 2024Observational
- Three-Dimensional Visualization System for Vitreoretinal Surgery: Results from a Monocentric Experience and Comparison with Conventional Surgery.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Magnification and Refocusing Comparison in Cataract Surgery Using a Heads-Up Three-Dimensional Visualization System versus Conventional Binocular Microscopy.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Heads-Up Three-Dimensional Viewing Systems in Vitreoretinal Surgery: An Updated Perspective.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Review
- Three-Dimensional Heads-Up vs. Standard Operating Microscope for Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Commentary: Three-dimensional heads-up display system for cataract surgery.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Impact of Heads-Up Display Use on Ophthalmologist Productivity, Wellness, and Musculoskeletal Symptoms: A Survey Study.Journal of current ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose: To compare the complication rates, surgical time and learning curve using the 3-D Heads up display system in comparison with the conventional microscope for routine cataract surgery.
methods: Consecutive consenting adults with uncomplicated cataract were offered phacoemulsification using the 3-D Heads up display system (ARTEVO 800 Carl Zeiss Meditec) or the conventional microscope (Zeiss Lumera 700) by two experienced surgeons. Surgical time, measured from start of corneal incision to removal of microscope from the surgical field and complication rates were compared between the groups.
results: Of the 343 eyes enrolled, 100 (29%) underwent surgery using the 3-D Heads up display system. The surgical time for 3-D Heads up display system was significantly higher in the 3-D group (8.4 ± 2.1 vs. 6.5 ± 1.8 minutes, P < 0.001). There were no group differences in surgical complications (2% in 3-D vs. 2.5% in conventional microscope, P = 0.28). Comparing across 4 quartiles within the 3-D group, the mean surgical time was slightly higher during the 1
conclusion: Phacoemulsification with the 3-D Heads up display system takes longer time but offers excellent visualization, ergonomics and safety compared to conventional microscopes. Experienced surgeons should be able to adapt easily after their first 50 surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.