Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34427197›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2021

Approach to optic neuritis: An update.

Swati Phuljhele, Sachin Kedar, Rohit Saxena

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Classic presentation of neuromyelitis optica: clinical case and review of the literature].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Treatment and Relapse Prevention of Typical and Atypical Optic Neuritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. miR-216b-5p Inhibited the Progression of Experimental Optic Neuritis via Downregulating FAS.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Swati PhuljheleNeuro-ophthalmology and Strabismus Services, Dr Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sachin KedarDepartment of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, USA.
Rohit SaxenaNeuro-ophthalmology and Strabismus Services, Dr Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INEmory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past few years, there has been remarkable development in the area of optic neuritis. The discovery of new antibodies has improved our understanding of the pathology of the disease. Antiaquaporin4 antibodies and antimyelin oligodendrocytes antibodies are now considered as distinct entities of optic neuritis with their specific clinical presentation, neuroimaging characteristics, treatment options, and course of the disease. Similarly, there has been a substantial change in the treatment of optic neuritis which was earlier limited to steroids and interferons. The development of new immunosuppressant drugs and monoclonal antibodies has reduced the relapses and improved the prognosis of optic neuritis as well as an associated systemic disease. This review article tends to provide an update on the approach and management of optic neuritis.

Indexed as

Optic NeuritisAntibodies, MonoclonalHumansNeuroimagingPrognosisRecurrenceAntibodies, Monoclonalmultiple sclerosisMyelin oligodendrocytesneuromyelitis opticaoptic neuritis

Identifiers

PMID34427197
PMCPMC8544067
OpenAlexW3195042347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.