ArticleJournal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A2021
A new approach method for characterizing inter-species toxicodynamic variability.
Article in Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Germ cell risk assessment of combined exposure to monosodium glutamate and bisphenol A in male SD rat: deciphering the molecular mechanisms.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Quantitative estimates of inter-individual variability for new approach methodologies-based systemic safety toolbox using a population-based human in vitro model.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026Article
- Systemic Toxicity of L-Mimosine in Rabbits: A Non-Rodent Model for Safety Assessment.Journal of applied toxicology : JAT · 2026Article
- Characterizing common loss-of-function genes and their potential utility in assessing population variability and chemical susceptibility.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Reducing uncertainty in dose-response assessments by incorporating Bayesian benchmark dose modeling and in vitro data on population variability.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025Article
- Incorporating new approach methods (NAMs) data in dose-response assessments: The future is now!Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2025Review
- Hepatocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells: Towards establishing anCurrent research in toxicology · 2025Article
- How neurobehavior and brain development in alternative whole-organism models can contribute to prediction of developmental neurotoxicity.Neurotoxicology · 2024Review
- Evaluating scientific confidence in the concordance of in vitro and in vivo protective points of departure.Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP · 2024Article
- Advancing probabilistic risk assessment by integrating human biomonitoring, new approach methods, and Bayesian modeling: A case study with the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol.Environment international · 2023Article
- Article
- Model systems and organisms for addressing inter- and intra-species variability in risk assessment.Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Inter-species differences in toxicodynamics are often a critical source of uncertainty in safety evaluations and typically dealt with using default adjustment factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.