Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34427055›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2021

Association of circulating PLA2G7 levels with cancer cachexia and assessment of darapladib as a therapy.

Pauline Morigny, Doris Kaltenecker, Julia Zuber, Juliano Machado, Lisa Mehr, Foivos-Filippos Tsokanos, Hanna Kuzi, Chris D Hermann, Michael Voelkl, German Monogarov and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Integrated analysis ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Pauline MorignyInstitute for Diabetes and Cancer, Helmholtz Center Munich, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8001-7069
Doris KalteneckerInstitute for Diabetes and Cancer, Helmholtz Center Munich, Neuherberg, Germany.
Julia ZuberInstitute for Diabetes and Cancer, Helmholtz Center Munich, Neuherberg, Germany.
Juliano MachadoInstitute for Diabetes and Cancer, Helmholtz Center Munich, Neuherberg, Germany.
Lisa MehrInstitute for Diabetes and Cancer, Helmholtz Center Munich, Neuherberg, Germany.
Foivos-Filippos TsokanosInstitute for Diabetes and Cancer, Helmholtz Center Munich, Neuherberg, Germany.
Hanna KuziDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Chris D HermannSchool of Medicine, Institutes of Molecular Immunology and Experimental Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Michael VoelklInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
German MonogarovGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Christoph SpringfeldDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases and Internal Medicine VI, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Victor LaurentInstitute for Diabetes and Cancer, Helmholtz Center Munich, Neuherberg, Germany.
Bernd EngelmannInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
Helmut FriessDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Inka ZörnigDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases and Internal Medicine VI, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Achim KrügerSchool of Medicine, Institutes of Molecular Immunology and Experimental Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jeroen KrijgsveldGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Olga ProkopchukDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Søren Fisker SchmidtInstitute for Diabetes and Cancer, Helmholtz Center Munich, Neuherberg, Germany.
Maria RohmInstitute for Diabetes and Cancer, Helmholtz Center Munich, Neuherberg, Germany.
Stephan HerzigInstitute for Diabetes and Cancer, Helmholtz Center Munich, Neuherberg, Germany.
Mauricio Berriel DiazInstitute for Diabetes and Cancer, Helmholtz Center Munich, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4670-919X
Heidelberg University · DETUM Klinikum · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF J 4224Austrian Science Fund FWF J4224-B34
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer cachexia (CCx) is a multifactorial wasting disorder characterized by involuntary loss of body weight that affects many cancer patients and implies a poor prognosis, reducing both tolerance to and efficiency of anticancer therapies. Actual challenges in management of CCx remain in the identification of tumour-derived and host-derived mediators involved in systemic inflammation and tissue wasting and in the discovery of biomarkers that would allow for an earlier and personalized care of cancer patients. The aim of this study was to identify new markers of CCx across different species and tumour entities.

methodsQuantitative secretome analysis was performed to identify specific factors characteristic of cachexia-inducing cancer cell lines. To establish the subsequently identified phospholipase PLA2G7 as a marker of CCx, plasma PLA2G7 activity and/or protein levels were measured in well-established mouse models of CCx and in different cohorts of weight-stable and weight-losing cancer patients with different tumour entities. Genetic PLA2G7 knock-down in tumours and pharmacological treatment using the well-studied PLA2G7 inhibitor darapladib were performed to assess its implication in the pathogenesis of CCx in C26 tumour-bearing mice.

resultsHigh expression and secretion of PLA2G7 were hallmarks of cachexia-inducing cancer cell lines. Circulating PLA2G7 activity was increased in different mouse models of CCx with various tumour entities and was associated with the severity of body wasting. Circulating PLA2G7 levels gradually rose during cachexia development. Genetic PLA2G7 knock-down in C26 tumours only partially reduced plasma PLA2G7 levels, suggesting that the host is also an important contributor. Chronic treatment with darapladib was not sufficient to counteract inflammation and tissue wasting despite a strong inhibition of the circulating PLA2G7 activity. Importantly, PLA2G7 levels were also increased in colorectal and pancreatic cancer patients with CCx.

conclusionsOverall, our data show that despite no immediate pathogenic role, at least when targeted as a single entity, PLA2G7 is a consistent marker of CCx in both mice and humans. The early increase in circulating PLA2G7 levels in pre-cachectic mice supports future prospective studies to assess its potential as biomarker for cancer patients.

Indexed as

CachexiaPancreatic Neoplasms1-Alkyl-2-acetylglycerophosphocholine EsteraseAnimalsBenzaldehydesBiomarkersBiphenyl CompoundsDiethylaminesHumansMiceOximesProspective StudiesPyrimidinonesSulfides1-Alkyl-2-acetylglycerophosphocholine EsteraseBenzaldehydesBiomarkersBiphenyl CompoundsdarapladibDiethylaminesOximesPLA2G7 protein, humanPla2g7 protein, mousePyrimidinonesSulfidesBiomarkerCancer cachexiaCancer patientsDarapladibMouse modelsPLA2G7

Identifiers

PMID34427055
PMCPMC8517355
OpenAlexW3195104546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.