Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34426894›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of implant dentistry2021

Effect of implantoplasty on the elastic limit of dental implants of different diameters.

Markel Diéguez-Pereira, David Chávarri-Prado, Iratxe Viteri-Agustín, Oier Montalban-Vadillo, Esteban Pérez-Pevida, Aritza Brizuela-Velasco

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of implant dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Markel Diéguez-PereiraDepartment of Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oviedo, C/ Catedrático Jose María Serrano s/n, 33006, Oviedo, Spain. markeldieguez@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5844-6596
David Chávarri-PradoDepartment of Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oviedo, C/ Catedrático Jose María Serrano s/n, 33006, Oviedo, Spain.
Iratxe Viteri-AgustínDepartment of Pharmacology and Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Zaragoza, 50009, Zaragoza, Spain.
Oier Montalban-VadilloDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.
Esteban Pérez-PevidaDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.
Aritza Brizuela-VelascoDepartment of Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oviedo, C/ Catedrático Jose María Serrano s/n, 33006, Oviedo, Spain.
Universidad de Oviedo · ESUniversidad de Salamanca · ESUniversidad de Zaragoza · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplantoplasty reduces both implant diameter and the thickness of its walls, subsequently reducing the ability of the implant to resist fracture in response to functional load. In combination with an increase in the crown-implant ratio due to bone loss, this could increase the lever effect, which in presence of high masticatory forces or parafunctional habits, could lead to complications such as fracture of the implant or loosening of the prosthetic screw.

objectivesTo determine the elastic limits of internal connection, dental implants of different designs and diameters after an implantoplasty. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis in vitro study included 315 tapered internal connection titanium dental implants, the threads of which were removed with an industrial milling machine-for standardized implantoplasty (IMP1; n = 105)-or with the conventional approach-manually, using high-speed burs (IMP2; n = 105). The remaining 105 implants were used as controls. The final implant diameters were recorded. The quality of the newly polished surfaces was assessed by scanning electron microscopy. All implants were subjected to a mechanical pressure resistance test. A Tukey's test for multiple comparisons was used to detect differences in the elastic limit and final implant diameters between the implant groups.

resultsThere were statistically significant differences in the elastic limit between the IMP1, IMP2, and control groups (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the implant diameter was significantly smaller in the IMP1 and IMP2 groups (p < 0.05). Scanning electron microscopy revealed smooth implant surfaces in the IMP1 and IMP2 groups, with some titanium particles visible in the IMP1 group.

conclusionsImplantoplasty significantly decreased the elastic limit of internal connection titanium dental implants, especially in those with a smaller diameter (3-3.5 mm).

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsCrownsMaterials TestingMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningTitaniumDental ImplantsTitanium

Identifiers

PMID34426894
PMCPMC8382817
OpenAlexW3193433414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.