Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34426843›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2021

Dietary Diversification and Specialization in Neotropical Bats Facilitated by Early Molecular Evolution.

Joshua H T Potter, Kalina T J Davies, Laurel R Yohe, Miluska K R Sanchez, Edgardo M Rengifo, Monika Struebig, Kim Warren, Georgia Tsagkogeorga, Burton K Lim, Mario Dos Reis and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Structural divergence and molecular adaptation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Bats as instructive animal models for studying longevity and aging.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The genome sequence ofWellcome open research · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Joshua H T PotterSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Kalina T J DaviesSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Laurel R YoheDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1567-8749
Miluska K R SanchezEscuela Profesional de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional de Piura, Piura, Peru.
Edgardo M RengifoEscola Superior de Agricultura 'Luiz de Queiroz,' Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura, Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Monika StruebigSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Kim WarrenSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Georgia TsagkogeorgaSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Burton K LimDepartment of Natural History, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mario Dos ReisSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Liliana M DávalosDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Stephen J RossiterSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

European Research Council 310482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary adaptation is a major feature of phenotypic and ecological diversification, yet the genetic basis of dietary shifts is poorly understood. Among mammals, Neotropical leaf-nosed bats (family Phyllostomidae) show unmatched diversity in diet; from a putative insectivorous ancestor, phyllostomids have radiated to specialize on diverse food sources including blood, nectar, and fruit. To assess whether dietary diversification in this group was accompanied by molecular adaptations for changing metabolic demands, we sequenced 89 transcriptomes across 58 species and combined these with published data to compare ∼13,000 protein coding genes across 66 species. We tested for positive selection on focal lineages, including those inferred to have undergone dietary shifts. Unexpectedly, we found a broad signature of positive selection in the ancestral phyllostomid branch, spanning genes implicated in the metabolism of all major macronutrients, yet few positively selected genes at the inferred switch to plantivory. Branches corresponding to blood- and nectar-based diets showed selection in loci underpinning nitrogenous waste excretion and glycolysis, respectively. Intriguingly, patterns of selection in metabolism genes were mirrored by those in loci implicated in craniofacial remodeling, a trait previously linked to phyllostomid dietary specialization. Finally, we show that the null model of the widely-used branch-site test is likely to be misspecified, with the implication that the test is too conservative and probably under-reports true cases of positive selection. Our findings point to a complex picture of adaptive radiation, in which the evolution of new dietary specializations has been facilitated by early adaptations combined with the generation of new genetic variation.

Indexed as

DietEvolution, MolecularSelection, GeneticAdaptation, BiologicalAnimalsCarbohydrate MetabolismChiropteraFeeding Behaviorbranch-site modeldietary evolutionmolecular adaptationpositive selection

Identifiers

PMID34426843
PMCPMC8382914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.