Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34426823›Full record

ReviewBritish medical bulletin2021

Why exercise has a crucial role in cancer prevention, risk reduction and improved outcomes.

Robert Thomas, Stacey A Kenfield, Yuuki Yanagisawa, Robert U Newton

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British medical bulletin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. A qualitative analysis of cancer patients' views on facilitators and barriers for the implementation of oncological exercise therapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  8. Diets Rich inNutrients · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Life Factors and Melanoma: From the Macroscopic State to the Molecular Mechanism.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Exercise Prescription in Cardio-Oncology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Robert ThomasDepartment of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.
Stacey A KenfieldDepartments of Urology and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California at San Francisco, Mission Hall, Box 1695-550, 16th Street, 6th Floor, San Francisco, CA 9414, USA.
Yuuki YanagisawaDepartment of Medicine, Bedford Hospital, Kempston road, Bedford MK42 9DJ, UK.
Robert U NewtonExercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Perth, WA 6027, Australia.
Addenbrooke's Hospital · GBBedford Hospital · GBEdith Cowan University · AUUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Impact of Web-Based Lifestyle Interventions on Prostate Cancer PrognosisR01CA207749 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KENFIELD, STACEY · 2016 to 2021
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionExercise is one of several factors known to lower the risk of developing cancer, as well as improve outcomes in patients already diagnosed. People who exercise after cancer have lower rates of cancer complications, treatment toxicities, relapse and improved survival. This review highlights the supportive data and biochemical processes, which explain these potential benefits. SOURCES OF DATA: PubMed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane libraries were searched for papers which addressed the effects of exercise and physical activity on cancer for this review. The search terms used were physical activity, exercise and cancer up to February 2021. We also referred to the background research required for international exercise intervention study involving men with prostate cancer (INTERVAL-GAP4) and scrutinized references within the robust papers published on this subject to ensure we did not miss any clinically studies. One hundred and eighty eight papers were included. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Exercise programmes mitigate many of the complications and risks associated with cancer, particularly thromboembolism, fatigue, weight gain, arthralgia, cognitive impairment and depression. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Molecular and biomarker changes, resulting from exercise, suggest that exercise elicits beneficial changes in insulin-related pathways, down-regulates inflammation and serum oestrogen levels, and enhances oxidative, immune and cellular repair pathways. Nonetheless, the evidence remains preliminary. GROWING POINTS: The timing, intensity and challenges of prehabilitation, adjunct and rehabilitation exercise programmes are being increasingly understood but their implementation remains sporadic. AREAS FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: More robust clinical trial data are needed to substantiate a causal effect of exercise on overall and cancer-specific survival. These studies are ongoing. Research evaluating the most cost-efficient ways of incorporating prehabilitation, adjunct and rehabilitation programmes into routine practice would be helpful to funding bodies and health care strategists.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalQuality of LifeDelivery of Health CareExerciseExercise TherapyHumansMaleRisk Reduction Behaviorcancer preventioncancer survivorshipexercise

Identifiers

PMID34426823
PMCPMC8431973
OpenAlexW3196026051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.