Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34426561›Full record

ArticleGut and liver2022

The Influence of Face Shields on the Quality of Colonoscopy in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Jin Wook Lee, Hyo Jeong Lee, Dae Sung Kim, Jiyoung Yoon, Seung Wook Hong, Ha Won Hwang, Jong-Soo Lee, Gwang-Un Kim, Sinwon Lee, Jaewon Choe and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut and liver, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jin Wook LeeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5312-4053
Hyo Jeong LeeDivision of Gastroenterology, Health Screening and Promotion Center, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5576-4142
Dae Sung KimDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4881-7883
Jiyoung YoonDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7448-4296
Seung Wook HongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1440-9950
Ha Won HwangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4065-5058
Jong-Soo LeeDivision of Gastroenterology, Health Screening and Promotion Center, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8002-2693
Gwang-Un KimDivision of Gastroenterology, Health Screening and Promotion Center, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4285-5969
Sinwon LeeDivision of Gastroenterology, Health Screening and Promotion Center, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6474-0604
Jaewon ChoeDivision of Gastroenterology, Health Screening and Promotion Center, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0393-6803
Jin Hwa ParkDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9402-5780
Dong-Hoon YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7756-2704
Jeong-Sik ByeonDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9793-6379
Ulsan College · KRAsan Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: The worldwide coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has led endoscopists to use personal protective equipment (PPE) for infection prevention. This study aimed to investigate whether wearing a face shield as PPE affects the quality of colonoscopy. Methods: We reviewed the medical records and colonoscopy findings of patients who underwent colonoscopies at Asan Medical Center, Korea from March 10 to May 31, 2020. The colonoscopies in this study were performed by five gastroenterology fellows and four expert endoscopists. We compared colonoscopy quality indicators, such as withdrawal time, adenoma detection rate (ADR), mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC), polypectomy time, and polypectomy adverse events, both before and after face shields were added as PPE on April 13, 2020. Results: Of the 1,344 colonoscopies analyzed, 715 and 629 were performed before and after the introduction of face shields, respectively. The median withdrawal time was similar between the face shield and no-face shield groups (8.72 minutes vs 8.68 minutes, p=0.816), as was the ADR (41.5% vs 39.8%, p=0.605) and APC (0.72 vs 0.77, p=0.510). Polypectomy-associated quality indicators, such as polypectomy time and polypectomy adverse events were also not different between the groups. Quality indicators were not different between the face shield and no-face shield groups of gastroenterology fellows, or of expert endoscopists. Conclusions: Colonoscopy performance was not unfavorably affected by the use of a face shield. PPE, including face shields, can be recommended without a concern about colonoscopy quality deterioration.

Indexed as

AdenomaColorectal NeoplasmsCOVID-19ColonoscopyEarly Detection of CancerHumansPandemicsRepublic of KoreaColonoscopyCOVID-19Face shieldPersonal protective equipmentQuality

Identifiers

PMID34426561
PMCPMC9099398
OpenAlexW3195162321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.