Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34426467›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

The 20 most important questions for novices of full-endoscopic spinal surgery in China: a mixed-method study protocol.

Can Liu, Hong Ling Chu, Geng Li, Jiao Yang He, Yun Long Ma, Chuan Chao Du, Bao Hai, Bin Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Can LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing First Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Beijing, China.
Hong Ling ChuThe Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-1846-9192
Geng LiThe Center for Pain Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiao Yang HeThe Center for Pain Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yun Long MaThe Center for Pain Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chuan Chao DuDepartment of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Bao HaiDepartment of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China haibao_doctor@163.com zhubin_ortho@126.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7404-918X
Bin ZhuDepartment of Orthopedics, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China haibao_doctor@163.com zhubin_ortho@126.com.
Peking University · CNCapital Medical University · CNIntegrated Chinese Medicine (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe full-endoscopic spinal surgery (FESS) procedure is widely accepted and welcomed in China. With the continuous development of minimally invasive surgery, the further expansion of indications and the greater diversity of techniques, spinal endoscopic surgery currently accounts for more than 10% of spinal surgery in China, ranking among the top in the world. However, the admission system and standardised training system for spinal endoscopic surgery are not perfect, which presents a challenge and disadvantage for novices. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Exploratory mixed methods are applied for designing this study. First, we will collect questions from novices by allowing them to openly list their concerns to those who have completed FESS. These qualitative questions will be categorised using NVivo software. To produce the qualitative results, a questionnaire for the sequential two-round Delphi approach will be developed to identify the 20 most important questions from novices. This study is planned to be started at April 2021, and completed at March 2022. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Research Ethics Committee of Peking University Third Hospital provided a waiver for this Delphi protocol. We expect that the findings will be published in a clinical journal and presented at conferences. Furthermore, we hope that the results can contribute to answering the questions raised by novices of spinal endoscopy in the form of books and to improving the training system for spinal endoscopy surgery.

Indexed as

EndoscopyResearch DesignChinaHumansNeurosurgical ProceduresSurveys and Questionnairespain managementspinesurgery

Identifiers

PMID34426467
PMCPMC8383874
OpenAlexW3196091489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.