Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34426401›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2023

Central macular OCTA parameters in glaucoma.

Takashi Nishida, Won Hyuk Oh, Sasan Moghimi, Adeleh Yarmohammadi, Huiyuan Hou, Ryan Caezar C David, Alireza Kamalipour, Takuhei Shoji, Nevin El-Nimri, Jasmin Rezapour and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Takashi NishidaHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Won Hyuk OhHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1362-5697
Sasan MoghimiHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Adeleh YarmohammadiHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Huiyuan HouHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Ryan Caezar C DavidHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Alireza KamalipourHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Takuhei ShojiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saitama Medical University, Iruma, Saitama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5464-2573
Nevin El-NimriHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Jasmin RezapourHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Linda M ZangwillHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Robert N WeinrebHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA rweinreb@ucsd.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9553-3202
University of California San Diego · USSaitama Medical University · JP

Funding

African Descent And Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES)U10EY014267 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ZANGWILL, LINDA M · 2002 to 2010
$13.2M
Vision BiostatisticsP30EY022589 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LINDA M ZANGWILL · 2012 to 2026
$10.3M
Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma:Structural AssessmentR01EY011008 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ZANGWILL, LINDA M · 1995 to 2015
$8.7M
Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS): High Myopia and Advanced DiseaseR01EY027510 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LINDA M ZANGWILL · 2017 to 2026
$5.3M
Diagnosis and Monitoring of Glaucoma with Optical Coherence Tomography AngiographyR01EY029058 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI WEINREB, ROBERT N · 2018 to 2024
$4.2M
African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation (ADAGES) II: Glaucoma ProgressionR01EY019869 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ZANGWILL, LINDA M · 2010 to 2014
$2.8M
African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation (ADAGES) IV: Alterations of the lamina cribrosa in progressionR01EY026574 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI FAZIO, MASSIMO ANTONIO, GIRKIN, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY · 2017 to 2020
$2.6M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY022589NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011008NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019869NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026574NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027510NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029058NEI NIH HHS U10 EY014267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsTo investigate the relationship between the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) parameters assessed by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and central visual field parameters in glaucoma and healthy subjects.

methodsOne hundred and eighty-eight subjects (248 eyes), including 24 healthy (38 eyes), 37 glaucoma suspect (42 eyes, and 127 primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) patients (168 eyes), underwent imaging using OCTA and standard automated perimetry using the 24-2 and 10-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm. OCTA-based and OCT-based FAZ parameters (superficial FAZ area, FAZ circumference), foveal vessel density (FD300) and foveal thickness were measured. The correlation between FAZ parameters and visual field parameters was assessed using linear mixed model.

resultsAxial length adjusted-FAZ area was not different among the three groups (mean (95% CI)): in healthy 0.31 (0.27 to 0.36) mm

conclusionsThe FD300, but not the FAZ area was correlated with 10° central visual field mean deviation and foveal threshold in healthy, glaucoma suspect and POAG eyes. In contrast, a smaller FAZ area was associated with lower IOP.

Indexed as

GlaucomaGlaucoma, Open-AngleMacula LuteaFluorescein AngiographyFovea CentralisHumansRetinal VesselsTomography, Optical Coherenceglaucomaimagingintraocular pressuremacula

Identifiers

PMID34426401
PMCPMC9368252
OpenAlexW3195959925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.