ArticleJournal of nutrition education and behavior2021
Development of Food Literacy Assessment Tool Targeting Adults With Low Income.
Article in Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a Digital Food and Nutrition Literacy Survey to Support Improvements in Diet Quality.Current developments in nutrition · 2026Article
- Defining and measuring food literacy in late childhood and adolescence: a scoping review.Public health nutrition · 2026Article
- Social Determinants of Food Literacy in Iranian Adult Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Translation, Adaptation, and Validity of the Short Food Literacy Questionnaire for Brazil.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Nutrition and Food Literacy in the MENA Region: A Review to Inform Nutrition Research and Policy Makers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Study on HIV/AIDS knowledge, sexual attitudes, sexual behaviors, and preventive services among young students in Chongqing, China.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- The Validation and Improvement of a Food Literacy Behavior Checklist for Food Literacy Programs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Food Myths or Food Facts? Study about Perceptions and Knowledge in a Portuguese Sample.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDevelop and test validity and reliability of the Food Literacy Assessment Tool (FLitT) in adults with low income.
designFace validity was tested using cognitive interviews, content validity using expert review, and internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability based on 2 administrations of the survey.
settingUrban choice food pantry in Cincinnati, OH.
participantsThere were 10 and 98 adults with low income for the cognitive interview and survey, respectively VARIABLES MEASURED: Knowledge, self-efficacy, and behavior required to plan and manage, select, prepare, and eat in relation to food. ANALYSIS: Cronbach α and Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 for internal consistency reliability and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for test-retest reliability.
resultsCognitive interviews and expert feedback suggested modifications to improve the clarity of FLitT and offer more response options. Testing shows acceptable internal consistency in self-efficacy (Cronbach α = 0.92) and behavior (Cronbach α = 0.90) but not in knowledge (Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 = 0.51). The FLitT shows acceptable test-retest reliability for knowledge (ICC = 0.84), self-efficacy (ICC = 0.70), and behavior (ICC = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The FLitT was developed and tested for face and content validity and internal and test-retest reliability in adults with low income. Additional research is needed to conduct a second round of face validity and test construct validity using factor analysis with a larger size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.