Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34425966›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry2021

Gene-Targeted, CREB-Mediated Induction of ΔFosB Controls Distinct Downstream Transcriptional Patterns Within D1 and D2 Medium Spiny Neurons.

Casey K Lardner, Yentl van der Zee, Molly S Estill, Hope G Kronman, Marine Salery, Ashley M Cunningham, Arthur Godino, Eric M Parise, Jee Hyun Kim, Rachael L Neve and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Epigenetic editing: from concept to clinic.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neuroepigenetic Editing.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Casey K LardnerNash Family Department of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Yentl van der ZeeNash Family Department of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Molly S EstillNash Family Department of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Hope G KronmanNash Family Department of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Marine SaleryNash Family Department of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Ashley M CunninghamNash Family Department of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Arthur GodinoNash Family Department of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Eric M PariseNash Family Department of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Jee Hyun KimNash Family Department of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Rachael L NeveGene Delivery Technology Core, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Li ShenNash Family Department of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Peter J HamiltonNash Family Department of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. Electronic address: peter.j.hamilton@vcuhealth.org.
Eric J NestlerNash Family Department of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. Electronic address: eric.nestler@mssm.edu.
Allen Institute for Brain Science · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Transcription Factors in Stimulant and Opioid ActionP01DA047233 · NIDA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Paul J. Kenny · 2019 to 2026
$16.5M
MOLECULAR STUDIES OF COCAINE ACTION IN BRAINR37DA007359 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI NESTLER, ERIC J. · 1996 to 2020
$6.9M
Molecular Studies of Cocaine Action in BrainR01DA007359 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI NESTLER, ERIC J. · 1991 to 2025
$5.6M
Using CRISPR tools to uncover the role of CREB-gene regulation in drug abuseR00DA045795 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI HAMILTON, PETER JAMES · 2020 to 2022
$739k
Engineering CRISPR constructs to elucidate the causal contribution of cell-type specific, gene-targeted CREB binding to the pathogenesis of drug abuseK99DA045795 · NIDA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI HAMILTON, PETER JAMES · 2018 to 2019
$354k
NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA045795NIDA NIH HHS P01 DA047233NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA045795NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA007359NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA007359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe onset and persistence of addiction phenotypes are, in part, mediated by transcriptional mechanisms in the brain that affect gene expression and, subsequently, neural circuitry. ΔFosB is a transcription factor that accumulates in the nucleus accumbens (NAc)-a brain region responsible for coordinating reward and motivation-after exposure to virtually every known rewarding substance, including cocaine and opioids. ΔFosB has also been shown to directly control gene transcription and behavior downstream of both cocaine and opioid exposure, but with potentially different roles in D1 and D2 medium spiny neurons (MSNs) in NAc.

methodsTo clarify MSN subtype-specific roles for ΔFosB and investigate how these coordinate the actions of distinct classes of addictive drugs in NAc, we developed a CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)/Cas9-based epigenome editing tool to induce endogenous ΔFosB expression in vivo in the absence of drug exposure. After inducing ΔFosB in D1- or D2-MSNs or both, we performed RNA sequencing on bulk male and female NAc tissue (n = 6-8/group).

resultsWe found that ΔFosB induction elicits distinct transcriptional profiles in NAc by MSN subtype and by sex, establishing for the first time that ΔFosB mediates different transcriptional effects in males versus females. We also demonstrated that changes in D1-MSNs, but not those in D2-MSNs or both, significantly recapitulate changes in gene expression induced by cocaine self-administration.

conclusionsTogether, these findings demonstrate the efficacy of a novel molecular tool for studying cell type-specific transcriptional mechanisms and shed new light on the activity of ΔFosB, a critical transcriptional regulator of drug addiction.

Indexed as

CocaineNucleus AccumbensAnimalsFemaleGene ExpressionMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicNeuronsReceptors, Dopamine D1CocaineReceptors, Dopamine D1CocaineGene editingNucleus accumbensOpioidsSubstance use disorderΔFosB

Identifiers

PMID34425966
PMCPMC8501456
OpenAlexW3181115653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.