Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34424504›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2022

Dental age estimation in children that have undergone antineoplastic treatment.

A Mitsea, K Seremidi, A Tsiligianni, S Gizani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Dental management of long-term childhood cancer survivors: a systematic review.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A MitseaDepartment of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, School of Dentistry, NKUA, 11527, Athens, Greece. anastasiamitsea@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2833-681X
K SeremidiDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, NKUA, Athens, Greece.
A TsiligianniDDS, Athens, Greece.
S GizaniDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, NKUA, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0701-6139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEven though many studies have been performed to estimate DA in general population, limited research has been performed concerning medical compromised populations such as childhood cancer survivors. The aims of this case-control study were (a) to estimate dental age in a population of children that have undergone antineoplastic treatment with three different methods and (b) to compare it with the estimates from healthy subjects (control group). MATERIALS AND

methodsSeventy-three oncology patients and equal number of healthy control subjects from the Pediatric dentistry Department had their dental age estimated through recent orthopantograms using Dermijian's, Willems' and London Atlas methods. All OPGs randomly assessed by two calibrated observers. Mean age difference was calculated. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was used to assess intra-observer reliability and the Concordance Correlation Coefficient used to assess inter-observer reliability.

resultsConcerning the CCS group 35 subjects (48%) were males and 38 (52%) were females, with an overall mean chronological age 10.95 years, ranging between 5.37 and 15.83 years. Intra- and inter-examiner reliability was exceptional for all methods. Mean DA differences in both groups and were not statistically sinificant regardless of the method used. The marginally lower values when males and females were investigated separately is basically due to the corresponding reduction of the sample size.

conclusionAn overestimation of DA observed in both groups by all methods was not significant. All three methods produced highly accurate comparable results when it comes to estimate the actual chronological age in both groups (CCS and control subjects) regardless of gender.

Indexed as

Age Determination by TeethAntineoplastic AgentsToothAdolescentCase-Control StudiesChildFemaleHumansMaleRadiography, PanoramicReproducibility of ResultsAntineoplastic AgentsCancer survivorsChildhood cancerDemirjian’s methodDental age estimationLondon Atlas antineoplastic therapyWillems’ method

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.